Sanitation financial tools (SFTs) for citywide inclusive sanitation (CWIS): A critical review

Camila Silva Franco*, Shirish Singh, Damir Brdjanovic

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Citywide Inclusive Sanitation (CWIS) is an approach for safely managed sanitation service provision aimed at achieving three core outcomes: equity, safety, and sustainability, which is crucial to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG 6). Financial planning is vital in promoting safe and sustainable sanitation services; hence, this study critically examines current Sanitation Financial Tools (SFTs) and the extent to which they incorporate the core CWIS outcomes. The analysis revealed that most tools consider these CWIS outcomes in isolation, if at all, and commonly neglect specific financial needs of low-income populations, protection of sanitation workers, gender equity, and disregard the financial sustainability of sanitation service provision. The findings underscore an urgent need for improved financial planning aligned with CWIS outcomes that support equitable, safe, and sustainable sanitation at scale, which contributes to informed decision-making for sustainable sanitation services.
Original languageEnglish
Article number126687
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume392
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Bibliographical note

Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository as part of the Taverne amendment. More information about this copyright law amendment can be found at https://www.openaccess.nl. Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.

Keywords

  • Citywide inclusive sanitation (CWIS)
  • Financial analysis
  • Sanitation financial Tool (SFT)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sanitation financial tools (SFTs) for citywide inclusive sanitation (CWIS): A critical review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this