Self-interest, positional concerns and distributional considerations in healthcare preferences

Aemiro Melkamu Daniel*, Job van Exel, Caspar G. Chorus

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

58 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Efficiently allocating scarce healthcare resources requires nuanced understanding of individual and collective interests as well as relative concerns, which may overlap or conflict. This paper is the first to empirically investigate whether and to what extent self-interest (SI), positional concerns (PC) and distributional considerations (DC) simultaneously explain individual decision making related to access to healthcare services. Our investigation is based on a stated choice experiment conducted in two countries with different healthcare systems, the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK). The choice experiment is on allocation of medical treatment waiting times for a hypothetical disease. We carry out the investigation under two different perspectives: (i) in a socially inclusive personal perspective decision makers were asked to choose between waiting time distributions for themselves and (ii) in a social perspective decision makers were asked to make similar choices for a close relative or friend of opposite gender. The results obtained by estimating a variety of advanced choice models indicate that DC, SI and PC, in this order of importance, are significant drivers of choice behaviour in our empirical context. These findings are consistent regardless of the choice perspective and the country where decision makers live. Comparing the results from different choice perspectives, we find that US respondents who chose for their close relative or friend attach significantly larger weight to their close relative’s or friend’s waiting times as well as to the overall distribution of waiting times than US respondents who chose for themselves. Looking at differences between countries, our results show that UK respondents who made choices for themselves placed significantly larger weight on SI and DC than US respondents, while US respondents, in turn, displayed relatively stronger but not significantly different positional concerns than UK respondents. In addition, we observe that UK respondents who chose for their close relative or friend put a larger weight on DC than their US counterparts. We conclude that the methodological (data collection and analysis) approach allows for disentangling the relative importance of the three motivations and discusses the potential implications of these findings for healthcare decision making.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-446
Number of pages24
JournalEuropean Journal of Health Economics
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Distributional considerations
  • Healthcare
  • Positional concerns
  • Self-interest
  • Waiting times

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Self-interest, positional concerns and distributional considerations in healthcare preferences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this