Semi-automated background removal limits data loss and normalizes imaging mass cytometry data

Marieke E. Ijsselsteijn, Antonios Somarakis, Boudewijn P.F. Lelieveldt, Thomas Höllt, Noel F. C. C. de Miranda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
110 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Imaging mass cytometry (IMC) allows the detection of multiple antigens (approximately 40 markers) combined with spatial information, making it a unique tool for the evaluation of complex biological systems. Due to its widespread availability and retained tissue morphology, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are often a material of choice for IMC studies. However, antibody performance and signal to noise ratios can differ considerably between FFPE tissues as a consequence of variations in tissue processing, including fixation. In contrast to batch effects caused by differences in the immunodetection procedure, variations in tissue processing are difficult to control. We investigated the effect of immunodetection-related signal intensity fluctuations on IMC analysis and phenotype identification, in a cohort of 12 colorectal cancer tissues. Furthermore, we explored different normalization strategies and propose a workflow to normalize IMC data by semi-automated background removal, using publicly available tools. This workflow can be directly applied to previously acquired datasets and considerably improves the quality of IMC data, thereby supporting the analysis and comparison of multiple samples.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1187-1197
Number of pages11
JournalCytometry Part A
Volume99
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • background removal
  • CyTOF
  • imaging mass cytometry
  • multiplex immunophenotyping

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Semi-automated background removal limits data loss and normalizes imaging mass cytometry data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this