TY - JOUR
T1 - Semi-automated background removal limits data loss and normalizes imaging mass cytometry data
AU - Ijsselsteijn, Marieke E.
AU - Somarakis, Antonios
AU - Lelieveldt, Boudewijn P.F.
AU - Höllt, Thomas
AU - de Miranda, Noel F. C. C.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Imaging mass cytometry (IMC) allows the detection of multiple antigens (approximately 40 markers) combined with spatial information, making it a unique tool for the evaluation of complex biological systems. Due to its widespread availability and retained tissue morphology, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are often a material of choice for IMC studies. However, antibody performance and signal to noise ratios can differ considerably between FFPE tissues as a consequence of variations in tissue processing, including fixation. In contrast to batch effects caused by differences in the immunodetection procedure, variations in tissue processing are difficult to control. We investigated the effect of immunodetection-related signal intensity fluctuations on IMC analysis and phenotype identification, in a cohort of 12 colorectal cancer tissues. Furthermore, we explored different normalization strategies and propose a workflow to normalize IMC data by semi-automated background removal, using publicly available tools. This workflow can be directly applied to previously acquired datasets and considerably improves the quality of IMC data, thereby supporting the analysis and comparison of multiple samples.
AB - Imaging mass cytometry (IMC) allows the detection of multiple antigens (approximately 40 markers) combined with spatial information, making it a unique tool for the evaluation of complex biological systems. Due to its widespread availability and retained tissue morphology, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are often a material of choice for IMC studies. However, antibody performance and signal to noise ratios can differ considerably between FFPE tissues as a consequence of variations in tissue processing, including fixation. In contrast to batch effects caused by differences in the immunodetection procedure, variations in tissue processing are difficult to control. We investigated the effect of immunodetection-related signal intensity fluctuations on IMC analysis and phenotype identification, in a cohort of 12 colorectal cancer tissues. Furthermore, we explored different normalization strategies and propose a workflow to normalize IMC data by semi-automated background removal, using publicly available tools. This workflow can be directly applied to previously acquired datasets and considerably improves the quality of IMC data, thereby supporting the analysis and comparison of multiple samples.
KW - background removal
KW - CyTOF
KW - imaging mass cytometry
KW - multiplex immunophenotyping
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109392023&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cyto.a.24480
DO - 10.1002/cyto.a.24480
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85109392023
SN - 1552-4922
VL - 99
SP - 1187
EP - 1197
JO - Cytometry Part A
JF - Cytometry Part A
IS - 12
ER -