TY - JOUR
T1 - Shared housing for students and young professionals
T2 - evolution of a market in need of regulation
AU - Uyttebrouck, Constance
AU - van Bueren, Ellen
AU - Teller, Jacques
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - This research addresses the shared housing market, that is, large-scale developments targeting students and ‘young professionals’, equipped with shared spaces and services for the residents. This housing segment has emerged in response to young adults’ demand for flexible and affordable housing. It has developed in cities that concentrate students and young single professionals, plan densification strategies and face housing commodification. We specifically explore the production side of this market, through the comparison of two projects in Amsterdam. Our objective is to understand the institutional context in which these projects were developed and their outcomes. Consequently, the research questions are: which actors develop these projects, what instruments do they use, and what are the outcomes in a commodifying housing market? From our analysis, the actors need to collaborate on shared housing developments and receive support from local governments, through the strategic use of planning instruments and tenure regulations. However, the shared facilities seem to merely serve to commercialize small housing production, while housing affordability and accessibility are threatened. We, thus, recommend local and national authorities to regulate the provision of shared spaces and suggest further research on the effects of the shared housing market in cities facing housing commodification.
AB - This research addresses the shared housing market, that is, large-scale developments targeting students and ‘young professionals’, equipped with shared spaces and services for the residents. This housing segment has emerged in response to young adults’ demand for flexible and affordable housing. It has developed in cities that concentrate students and young single professionals, plan densification strategies and face housing commodification. We specifically explore the production side of this market, through the comparison of two projects in Amsterdam. Our objective is to understand the institutional context in which these projects were developed and their outcomes. Consequently, the research questions are: which actors develop these projects, what instruments do they use, and what are the outcomes in a commodifying housing market? From our analysis, the actors need to collaborate on shared housing developments and receive support from local governments, through the strategic use of planning instruments and tenure regulations. However, the shared facilities seem to merely serve to commercialize small housing production, while housing affordability and accessibility are threatened. We, thus, recommend local and national authorities to regulate the provision of shared spaces and suggest further research on the effects of the shared housing market in cities facing housing commodification.
KW - Commodification
KW - Institutional framework
KW - Regulation
KW - Shared housing
KW - Young professionals
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089857338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10901-020-09778-w
DO - 10.1007/s10901-020-09778-w
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85089857338
SN - 1566-4910
VL - 35
SP - 1017
EP - 1035
JO - Journal of Housing and the Built Environment
JF - Journal of Housing and the Built Environment
IS - 4
ER -