Abstract
In 1972, Christopher Stone’s seminal essay, ‘Should Trees Have Standing?’, challenged anthropocentric legal frameworks by proposing legal rights for non-human entities, sparking a paradigm shift in environmental law and ethics (Stone, 1972). More than 50 years later, the extension of legal rights to non-human entities has evolved significantly, with non-human stakeholders such as rivers and ecosystems being granted legal personhood in various jurisdictions worldwide (e.g. Boyd, 2017; Kauffman & Martin, 2021). [...]
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 2527629 |
| Pages (from-to) | 673-682 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Planning Practice and Research |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Should buildings have standing?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver