Should we use the NASA-TLX in HCI? A review of theoretical and methodological issues around Mental Workload Measurement

Ebrahim Babaei*, Tilman Dingler, Benjamin Tag, Eduardo Velloso

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

229 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Mental Workload (MWL) is a construct widely used in HCI to assess the cognitive demand users must exert to perform a task. Research in human factors, however, has suggested several issues regarding its definitions, scales, and applications. This paper, first, introduces debates surrounding the MWL concept and its most popular measure, the NASA-TLX. We present a systematic review of CHI papers involving MWL and highlight severe issues in its application. Finally, through a validation experiment, we assess the convergent validity and sensitivity of two MWL instruments—NASA-TLX and MRQ. Our findings reveal disagreements in the definitions of MWL and severe drawbacks in NASA-TLX and its applications. Our validation study also presents evidence for a lack of convergent validity and sensitivity of MWL subjective scales in HCI tasks. Our findings recommend caution when employing NASA-TLX in user studies and highlight the need for an MWL definition that is agreed upon within the HCI community.
Original languageEnglish
Article number103515
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Human Computer Studies
Volume201
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Cognitive load
  • Mental workload
  • Multiple resource questionnaire
  • NASA-TLX

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should we use the NASA-TLX in HCI? A review of theoretical and methodological issues around Mental Workload Measurement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this