Simulating wave runup on an intermediate–reflective beach using a wave-resolving and a wave-averaged version of XBeach

A. F. de Beer, R. T. McCall, J. W. Long, M. F.S. Tissier, A. J.H.M. Reniers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The prediction of wave runup, as well as its components, time-averaged setup and the time-varying swash, is a key element of coastal storm hazard assessments, as wave runup controls the transitions between morphodynamic response types such as dune erosion and overwash, and the potential for flooding by wave overtopping. While theoretically able to simulate the dominant low-frequency swash, previous studies using the infragravity-wave–resolving model XBeach (XBSB) have shown an underestimation of the observed swash variance and wave runup, which was in part related to the absence of incident-band swash motions in the model. Here, we use an incident-band wave-resolving, non-hydrostatic version of the XBeach model (XBNH) to simulate wave runup observed during the SandyDuck '97 experiment on an intermediate–reflective sandy beach. The results show that the XBNH model describes wave runup and the individual setup and swash components well. We subsequently examine differences in wave runup prediction between the XBSB and XBNH models and find that the XBNH model is a better predictor of wave runup than XBSB for this beach, which is due to better predictions of both the incident-band and infragravity-band swash. For a range of beach states from reflective to dissipative it is shown that incident-band swash is underestimated by XBSB relative to XBNH, in particular for reflective conditions. Infragravity-band swash is shown to be lower in XBSB than XBNH for most conditions, including dissipative conditions for which the mean difference is 16% of the deep water wave height. The difference in infragravity-band swash in XBNH relative to XBSB is shown to mainly be the result of processes occurring outside the swash zone, but approximately 15% of the difference is caused by explicitly resolving incident-band wave motions within the swash zone, such as swash-swash interactions, which inherently cannot be simulated by wave-averaged models.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103788
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalCoastal Engineering
Volume163
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Infragravity waves
  • Non-hydrostatic modeling
  • Runup
  • Swash
  • XBeach

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Simulating wave runup on an intermediate–reflective beach using a wave-resolving and a wave-averaged version of XBeach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this