Size and exergy assessment of solid oxide fuel cell-based H2-fed power generation system with alternative electrolytes: A comparative study

Mohsen Sadeghi, Moharram Jafari, Yashar S. Hajimolana, Theo Woudstra, P. V. Aravind

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)


This work aims to analyse and compare the thermodynamic performance and size of two types of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC)-based plants. The former is the conventional H2-fed plant based on SOFC with an oxygen-ion conducting electrolyte (SOFC-O), and the latter is based on SOFC using a proton-conducting electrolyte (SOFC-H). Thermodynamic analysis reveals that in the SOFC-H system, due to H2O formation at the cathode side, not only the anode concentration losses decreases, but also the partial pressure difference between H2 and H2O increases which leads to an increase in Nernst voltage compared to the SOFC-O system. Due to this, SOFC-H and SOFC-O based plants exhibit different performance in terms of the cell voltage, power, efficiency, stack outlet temperature and size of heat exchangers used for preheating the fuel and air. The results indicate, for current densities less than around 3,000 A/m2, the energy and exergy efficiencies of SOFC-H-based system are more than those of the SOFC-O-based plant. This results in reduced area of heat exchangers per unit power used in the SOFC-H-based plant as compared with the SOFC-O-based plant. In addition, the sensitivity analysis demonstrates that using thin cells in the SOFC stack is favourable for the SOFC-H-based plant.

Original languageEnglish
Article number113681
Number of pages13
JournalEnergy Conversion and Management
Publication statusPublished - 2021


  • Exergy
  • Heat exchanger size
  • Oxygen ion-conducting electrolyte
  • Proton-conducting electrolyte
  • Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC)


Dive into the research topics of 'Size and exergy assessment of solid oxide fuel cell-based H<sub>2</sub>-fed power generation system with alternative electrolytes: A comparative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this