Projects per year
Abstract
This commentary is a response to Contextual Integrity as a General Conceptual Tool for Evaluating Technological Change by Elizabeth O’Neill (Philosophy & Technology (2022)). It argues that while contextual integrity (CI) might be an useful addition to the toolkit of approaches for ethical technology assessment, a CI approach might not be able to uncover all morally relevant impacts of technological change. Moreover, the inherent conservatism of a CI approach might be problematic in cases in which we encounter new kinds of morally problematic situations, such as climate change, or when technology reinforces historically grown injustices.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 82 |
Journal | Philosophy and Technology |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Keywords
- Contextual integrity
- Disruptive technologies
- Ethics
- Technological change
- Technomoral change
- Value change
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Socially Disruptive Technologies, Contextual Integrity, and Conservatism About Moral Change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Active
-
ESDIT: Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies
Braamhaar , M. H., de Boer, S. W., Hopster, J., Bollen, C. J. M., van den Hoven, M. J., Ziliotti, E., Clancy III, R. F., Buijsman, S. N. R., Doorn, N., Copeland, S. M., Duran, J. M., Fraaije, A., Gammon, A. R., van Grunsven, J. B., Hofbauer, B., van den Hoven, M. J., Jonker, C. M., Klenk, M. B. O. T., Kudina, O., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., Marchiori, S., Marin, L., Moesker, K., Pesch, U., van de Poel, I. R., Roeser, S., Sand, M., Santoni De Sio, F., Sta. Maria, J. E., Steinert, S., Taebi, B., Veluwenkamp, H. M. & Ziliotti, E.
1/01/20 → 31/12/29
Project: Research