Solving large-scale railway scheduling problems with automated and assisted driving systems

The railway scheduling problem concerns the determination of trains' scheduled departure and arrival times at stops, and the allocation of capacity in the network. The timetable must be both conflict-free given infrastructure constraints, and stable enough for trains to recover from delays that could occur in normal operations. Existing methods for tactical scheduling contain a tradeoff between having an accurate (microscopic) representation of signalling constraints, and having a simple-enough (macroscopic) infrastructure representation to scale to real-world problem instances. This creates issues for infrastructure managers looking to run more trains on their infrastructure by migrating to Distance-To-Go (DTG) signalling systems (e.g. ETCS Level 2), and to exploit the capabilities of Connected Driver Advisory Systems (C-DAS) and Automatic Train Operation (ATO) to control trains more precisely. In this paper, we present a methodology for incorporating the capabilities of DTG signalling in conjunction with C-DAS and ATO systems into a disjunctive scheduling model for both periodic and nonperiodic instances. We show that the resulting model has both a microscopic infrastructure representation, and a macroscopic computational complexity, allowing railways to quickly compute conflict-free and stable timetables for large problem instances. The resulting model also accurately represents the computation of the brake indication point for both conventional and DTG signalling as a function of the trains' current speed. Tests on a large-scale periodic scheduling instance in the UK show that the model produces timetables with reasonable computation time.