TY - JOUR
T1 - Stability metrics for optic radiation tractography
T2 - Towards damage prediction after resective surgery
AU - Meesters, Stephan
AU - Ossenblok, Pauly
AU - Wagner, Louis
AU - Schijns, Olaf
AU - Boon, Paul
AU - Florack, Luc
AU - Vilanova Bartroli, Anna
AU - Duits, Remco
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Background An accurate delineation of the optic radiation (OR) using diffusion MR tractography may reduce the risk of a visual field deficit after temporal lobe resection. However, tractography is prone to generate spurious streamlines, which deviate strongly from neighboring streamlines and hinder a reliable distance measurement between the temporal pole and the Meyer's loop (ML-TP distance). New method Stability metrics are introduced for the automated removal of spurious streamlines near the Meyer's loop. Firstly, fiber-to-bundle coherence (FBC) measures can identify spurious streamlines by estimating their alignment with the surrounding streamline bundle. Secondly, robust threshold selection removes spurious streamlines while preventing an underestimation of the extent of the Meyer's loop. Standardized parameter selection is realized through test–retest evaluation of the variability in ML-TP distance. Results The variability in ML-TP distance after parameter selection was below 2 mm for each of the healthy volunteers studied (N = 8). The importance of the stability metrics is illustrated for epilepsy surgery candidates (N = 3) for whom the damage to the Meyer's loop was evaluated by comparing the pre- and post-operative OR reconstruction. The difference between predicted and observed damage is in the order of a few millimeters, which is the error in measured ML-TP distance. Comparison with existing method(s) The stability metrics are a novel method for the robust estimate of the ML-TP distance. Conclusions The stability metrics are a promising tool for clinical trial studies, in which the damage to the OR can be related to the visual field deficit that may occur after epilepsy surgery.
AB - Background An accurate delineation of the optic radiation (OR) using diffusion MR tractography may reduce the risk of a visual field deficit after temporal lobe resection. However, tractography is prone to generate spurious streamlines, which deviate strongly from neighboring streamlines and hinder a reliable distance measurement between the temporal pole and the Meyer's loop (ML-TP distance). New method Stability metrics are introduced for the automated removal of spurious streamlines near the Meyer's loop. Firstly, fiber-to-bundle coherence (FBC) measures can identify spurious streamlines by estimating their alignment with the surrounding streamline bundle. Secondly, robust threshold selection removes spurious streamlines while preventing an underestimation of the extent of the Meyer's loop. Standardized parameter selection is realized through test–retest evaluation of the variability in ML-TP distance. Results The variability in ML-TP distance after parameter selection was below 2 mm for each of the healthy volunteers studied (N = 8). The importance of the stability metrics is illustrated for epilepsy surgery candidates (N = 3) for whom the damage to the Meyer's loop was evaluated by comparing the pre- and post-operative OR reconstruction. The difference between predicted and observed damage is in the order of a few millimeters, which is the error in measured ML-TP distance. Comparison with existing method(s) The stability metrics are a novel method for the robust estimate of the ML-TP distance. Conclusions The stability metrics are a promising tool for clinical trial studies, in which the damage to the OR can be related to the visual field deficit that may occur after epilepsy surgery.
KW - Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Epilepsy
KW - Fiber tractography
KW - Meyer's loop
KW - Neurosurgery
KW - Optic radiation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021299663&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:1048e3bd-ccfa-44e8-a63b-9475bf57dffe
U2 - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.05.029
DO - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.05.029
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85021299663
SN - 0165-0270
VL - 288
SP - 34
EP - 44
JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
ER -