TY - JOUR
T1 - Stabilization of premixed hydrogen–air flames in a trapped vortex combustor
AU - Altenburg, Luuk A.
AU - Klein, Sikke A.
AU - Tummers, Mark J.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - This study investigates flame stabilization and flashback in a trapped vortex combustor operating on a lean premixed hydrogen–air mixture at an equivalence ratio of ϕ=0.35. The combustor geometry features a U-bend in conjuction with a liner plate that aerodynamically stabilizes the flame. Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) was used to study the (reacting) flow in detail at two Reynolds numbers: Re=9.68×103 (case R-1, marginally stable flame) and Re=13.55×103 (case R-2, highly stable flame). Within the U-bend, the flame front shows steady laminar-like behaviour where the velocity is primarily tangential to the flame front. Downstream of the U-bend, the shear layer weakens and the flame front becomes more intermittent. This intermittency may cause flame bulges to reach low-velocity zones near the U-bend wall, increasing the possibility of flame flashback through the boundary layer that wall. An analysis of the strain rate tensor shows that within the U-bend, the angle between the flame front normal and the most extensive strain rate direction remains close to 45°, indicating the dominance of shear straining in this region. Further downstream, alignment with the most extensive strain rate increases, indicating that combustion-induced expansion becomes more dominant.
AB - This study investigates flame stabilization and flashback in a trapped vortex combustor operating on a lean premixed hydrogen–air mixture at an equivalence ratio of ϕ=0.35. The combustor geometry features a U-bend in conjuction with a liner plate that aerodynamically stabilizes the flame. Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) was used to study the (reacting) flow in detail at two Reynolds numbers: Re=9.68×103 (case R-1, marginally stable flame) and Re=13.55×103 (case R-2, highly stable flame). Within the U-bend, the flame front shows steady laminar-like behaviour where the velocity is primarily tangential to the flame front. Downstream of the U-bend, the shear layer weakens and the flame front becomes more intermittent. This intermittency may cause flame bulges to reach low-velocity zones near the U-bend wall, increasing the possibility of flame flashback through the boundary layer that wall. An analysis of the strain rate tensor shows that within the U-bend, the angle between the flame front normal and the most extensive strain rate direction remains close to 45°, indicating the dominance of shear straining in this region. Further downstream, alignment with the most extensive strain rate increases, indicating that combustion-induced expansion becomes more dominant.
KW - Boundary layer flashback
KW - FlameSheet technology
KW - Hydrogen combustion
KW - Strained flames
KW - Turbulent premixed flames
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105027449252&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.153469
DO - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.153469
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105027449252
SN - 0360-3199
VL - 208
JO - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
JF - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
M1 - 153469
ER -