Steam cracking and methane to olefins: Energy use, CO2 emissions and production costs

Tao Ren, Martin K. Patel, Kornelis Blok

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

192 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While most olefins (e.g., ethylene and propylene) are currently produced through steam cracking routes, they can also possibly be produced from natural gas (i.e., methane) via methanol and oxidative coupling routes. We reviewed recent data in the literature and then compared the energy use, CO2 emissions and production costs of methane-based routes with those of steam cracking routes. We found that methane-based routes use more than twice as much process energy than state-of-the-art steam cracking routes do (the energy content of products is excluded). The methane-based routes can be economically attractive in remote, gas-rich regions where natural gas is available at low prices. The development of liquefied natural gas (LNG) may increase the prices of natural gas in these locations. Oxidative coupling routes are currently still immature due to low ethylene yields and other problems. While several possibilities for energy efficiency improvement do exist, none of the natural gas-based routes is likely to become more energy efficient or to lead to less CO2 emissions than steam cracking routes do.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)817-833
Number of pages17
JournalEnergy
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Energy efficiency
  • Ethylene
  • Methanol
  • Natural gas
  • Steam cracking

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Steam cracking and methane to olefins: Energy use, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and production costs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this