Strengths and weaknesses of accessibility instruments in planning practice: technological rules based on experiential workshops

M te Brommelstroet, C Curtis, A Larsson, D Milakis

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

Keywords

@article{aac17072c3d0400aaa120c127dc6fcba,

title = "Strengths and weaknesses of accessibility instruments in planning practice: technological rules based on experiential workshops",

keywords = "CWTS JFIS < 0.75",

author = "{te Brommelstroet}, M and C Curtis and A Larsson and D Milakis",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1080/09654313.2015.1135231",

language = "English",

volume = "24",

pages = "1173--1196",

journal = "European Planning Studies",

issn = "0965-4313",

publisher = "Routledge - Taylor & Francis Group",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strengths and weaknesses of accessibility instruments in planning practice: technological rules based on experiential workshops

AU - te Brommelstroet, M

AU - Curtis, C

AU - Larsson, A

AU - Milakis, D

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

KW - CWTS JFIS < 0.75

U2 - 10.1080/09654313.2015.1135231

DO - 10.1080/09654313.2015.1135231

M3 - Article

SN - 0965-4313

VL - 24

SP - 1173

EP - 1196

JO - European Planning Studies

JF - European Planning Studies

IS - 6

ER -