Abstract
Background: Surgical instrument counting is a manual, attention-intensive task of the operating room (OR) nurse. Many labour-saving technologies have been proposed, but implementation remains challenging. Knowledge of current counting methods and staff preferences could guide future developments towards effective application. Approach: We observed OR nurses counting materials and instruments in 50 surgical procedures performed by various surgical specialties in a regional teaching hospital in Delft, The Netherlands. Additionally, we surveyed them on their preferences concerning the methods of counting. Key findings: Variations in approaches of surgical counting were observed, with OR nurses using multiple strategies and counting techniques to manage disruptions and limit workload. Interest in using supportive technology is limited to the preoperative and postoperative phase. Relevance: This research relates observational data to staff preferences. Our findings may guide future developments of labour-saving innovations regarding surgical counting towards developing more effective applications and to ensure successful implementation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 100087 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Human Factors in Healthcare |
| Volume | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Efficiency
- Surgical instrument counting
- Technology
- Workflow
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical instrument counting: Current practice and staff perspectives on technological support'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver