TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematic review of machine learning applications using nonoptical motion tracking in surgery
AU - Carciumaru, Teona Z.
AU - Tang, Cadey M.
AU - Farsi, Mohsen
AU - Bramer, Wichor M.
AU - Dankelman, Jenny
AU - Raman, Chirag
AU - Dirven, Clemens M.F.
AU - Gholinejad, Maryam
AU - Vasilic, Dalibor
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This systematic review explores machine learning (ML) applications in surgical motion analysis using non-optical motion tracking systems (NOMTS), alone or with optical methods. It investigates objectives, experimental designs, model effectiveness, and future research directions. From 3632 records, 84 studies were included, with Artificial Neural Networks (38%) and Support Vector Machines (11%) being the most common ML models. Skill assessment was the primary objective (38%). NOMTS used included internal device kinematics (56%), electromagnetic (17%), inertial (15%), mechanical (11%), and electromyography (1%) sensors. Surgical settings were robotic (60%), laparoscopic (18%), open (16%), and others (6%). Procedures focused on bench-top tasks (67%), clinical models (17%), clinical simulations (9%), and non-clinical simulations (7%). Over 90% accuracy was achieved in 36% of studies. Literature shows NOMTS and ML can enhance surgical precision, assessment, and training. Future research should advance ML in surgical environments, ensure model interpretability and reproducibility, and use larger datasets for accurate evaluation.
AB - This systematic review explores machine learning (ML) applications in surgical motion analysis using non-optical motion tracking systems (NOMTS), alone or with optical methods. It investigates objectives, experimental designs, model effectiveness, and future research directions. From 3632 records, 84 studies were included, with Artificial Neural Networks (38%) and Support Vector Machines (11%) being the most common ML models. Skill assessment was the primary objective (38%). NOMTS used included internal device kinematics (56%), electromagnetic (17%), inertial (15%), mechanical (11%), and electromyography (1%) sensors. Surgical settings were robotic (60%), laparoscopic (18%), open (16%), and others (6%). Procedures focused on bench-top tasks (67%), clinical models (17%), clinical simulations (9%), and non-clinical simulations (7%). Over 90% accuracy was achieved in 36% of studies. Literature shows NOMTS and ML can enhance surgical precision, assessment, and training. Future research should advance ML in surgical environments, ensure model interpretability and reproducibility, and use larger datasets for accurate evaluation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85218217293&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41746-024-01412-1
DO - 10.1038/s41746-024-01412-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85218217293
SN - 2398-6352
VL - 8
JO - npj Digital Medicine
JF - npj Digital Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 28
ER -