Systemic risks and solar climate engineering research. Integrating technology ethics into the governance of systemic risks

B. Hofbauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (SciVal)
122 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The paper explores how the framework of systemic risks can help govern the risks imposed through solar climate engineering research. The central argument is that a systemic perspective of risk is a useful tool for analysing and assessing the risks imposed through Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) research. SAI is a form of climate engineering that could cool the planet by enhancing its albedo through the injection of aerosols into the stratosphere. Researching such a technology creates systemic risks with a strong sociotechnical component. This component consists of the potential societal harm that a developing or new technology might cause to existing norms, values, institutions, and politics. The systemic risk framework is a valuable heuristic for this case, given the complex interdependencies of societal systems, infrastructures, markets, etc. At the same time, the systemic risk framework can be enhanced through the inclusion of a more robust and reflected ethical considerations on technological risks. Consequently, this article seeks to supplement the systemic risk governance framework with insights from technology ethics. Specifically, the paper offers an ethically reflective conception of societal value dynamism and stakeholder engagement and participation, tying it to existing systemic risk governance approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1383-1395
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Risk Research
Volume26
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • ethics of technology
  • participation
  • risk governance
  • solar climate engineering
  • Systemic risk
  • values

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systemic risks and solar climate engineering research. Integrating technology ethics into the governance of systemic risks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this