Tackling inter-subject variability in smartwatch data using factorization models

Arman Naseri*, David M.J. Tax, Ivo van der Bilt, Marcel Reinders

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Smartwatches enable longitudinal and continuous data acquisition. This has the potential to remotely monitor (changes) of the health of users. However, differences among subjects (inter-subject variability) limit a model to generalize to unseen subjects. This study focused on binary classification tasks using heart rate and step counter from smartwatches, including night/day and inactive/active classification, as well as sleep and SpO2-related (oxygen saturation) tasks. To address inter-subject variability, we explored different transforming and normalization regimes for time series including per-subject and population-based strategies. We propose a modified factorized autoencoder, which separates the data into two latent spaces capturing class-specific and subject-specific information. Our proposed generalized factorized autoencoder and triplet factorized autoencoder improved classification accuracy over the baseline from 74.8 (± 10.5) to 83.1 (± 5.1) and 83.4 (± 5.3), respectively, for night/day classification, gains for inactive/active classification were modest, improving from 84.3 (± 9.4) to 86.9 (± 4.4) and 86.6 (± 4.3), respectively. Our study highlights challenges of handling inter-subject variability in smartwatch data and how factorization models can be used to enable more robust and personalized health monitoring solutions for diverse populations.
Original languageEnglish
Article number26704
Number of pages12
JournalScientific Reports
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Inter-subject variability
  • Machine learning
  • Neural networks
  • Smartwatch

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tackling inter-subject variability in smartwatch data using factorization models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this