TY - JOUR
T1 - Technical note
T2 - A guide to using three open-source quality control algorithms for rainfall data from personal weather stations
AU - El Hachem, Abbas
AU - Seidel, Jochen
AU - O'hara, Tess
AU - Villalobos Herrera, Roberto
AU - Overeem, Aart
AU - Uijlenhoet, Remko
AU - Bárdossy, András
AU - De Vos, Lotte
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The number of rainfall observations from personal weather stations (PWSs) has increased significantly over the past years; however, there are persistent questions about data quality. In this paper, we reflect on three quality control algorithms (PWSQC, PWS-pyQC, and GSDR-QC) designed for the quality control (QC) of rainfall data. Technical and operational guidelines are provided to help interested users in finding the most appropriate QC to apply for their use case. All three algorithms can be accessed within the OpenSense sandbox where users can run the code. The results show that all three algorithms improve PWS data quality when cross-referenced against a rain radar data product. The considered algorithms have different strengths and weaknesses depending on the PWS and official data availability, making it inadvisable to recommend one over another without carefully considering the specific setting. The authors highlight a need for further objective quantitative benchmarking of QC algorithms. This requires freely available test datasets representing a range of environments, gauge densities, and weather patterns.
AB - The number of rainfall observations from personal weather stations (PWSs) has increased significantly over the past years; however, there are persistent questions about data quality. In this paper, we reflect on three quality control algorithms (PWSQC, PWS-pyQC, and GSDR-QC) designed for the quality control (QC) of rainfall data. Technical and operational guidelines are provided to help interested users in finding the most appropriate QC to apply for their use case. All three algorithms can be accessed within the OpenSense sandbox where users can run the code. The results show that all three algorithms improve PWS data quality when cross-referenced against a rain radar data product. The considered algorithms have different strengths and weaknesses depending on the PWS and official data availability, making it inadvisable to recommend one over another without carefully considering the specific setting. The authors highlight a need for further objective quantitative benchmarking of QC algorithms. This requires freely available test datasets representing a range of environments, gauge densities, and weather patterns.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208110619&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5194/hess-28-4715-2024
DO - 10.5194/hess-28-4715-2024
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85208110619
SN - 1027-5606
VL - 28
SP - 4715
EP - 4731
JO - Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
JF - Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
IS - 20
ER -