The City as a License. Implications of Blockchain and Distributed Ledgers for Urban Governance

Inte Gloerich, Martijn de Waal, Gabriele Ferri, N. Cila, Tara Karpinski

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
39 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) such as blockchain have in recent years been presented as a new general-purpose technology that could underlie many aspects of social and economic life, including civics and urban governance. In an urban context, over the past few years, a number of actors have started to explore the application of distributed ledgers in amongst others smart city services as well as in blockchain for good and urban commons-projects. DLTs could become the administrative backbones of such projects, as the technology can be set-up as an administration, management and allocation tool for urban resources. With the addition of smart contracts, DLTs can further automate the processing of data and execution of decisions in urban resource management through algorithmic governance. This means that the technological set-up and design of such DLT based systems could have large implications for the ways urban resources are governed. Positive contributions are expected to be made toward (local) democracy, transparent governance, decentralization, and citizen empowerment. We argue that to fully scrutinize the implications for urban governance, a critical analysis of distributed ledger technologies is necessary. In this contribution, we explore the lens of “the city as a license” for such a critical analysis. Through this lens, the city is framed as a “rights-management-system,” operated through DLT technology. Building upon Lefebvrian a right to the city-discourses, such an approach allows to ask important questions about the implications of DLTs for the democratic governance of cities in an open, inclusive urban culture. Through a technological exploration combined with a speculative approach, and guided by our interest in the rights management and agency that blockchains have been claimed to provide to their users, we trace six important issues: quantification; blockchain as a normative apparatus; the complicated relationship between transparency and accountability; the centralizing forces that act on blockchains; the degrees to which algorithmic rules can embed democratic law-making and enforcing; and finally, the limits of blockchain's trustlessness.
Original languageEnglish
Article number534942
Pages (from-to)56-70
Number of pages14
JournalFrontiers in Sustainable Cities
Volume2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • blockchain
  • distributed ledgers
  • platformization
  • public values
  • urban governance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The City as a License. Implications of Blockchain and Distributed Ledgers for Urban Governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • The Blockchain and the Commons: Dilemmas in the Design of Local Platforms

    Cila, N., Ferri, G., de Waal, M., Gloerich, I. & Karpinski, T., 2020, CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM-SIGCHI, p. 1-14 3376660. (Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeConference contributionScientificpeer-review

    37 Citations (Scopus)

Cite this