The dangers of single-lap shear testing in understanding polymer composite welded joints

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Single-lap shear (SLS) joints are straightforward to manufacture. This makes them especially attractive for testing polymer composite welded joints. Owing to local heating, which is characteristic of composite welding processes, the production of more geometrically intricate joints (such as double-lap or scarfed joints) or bigger joints (such as end-notched flexure or double cantilever beam) typically entails significant complexity in the design of the welding process. Testing of SLS joints is also uncomplicated and, even though, owing to mixed-mode loading and uneven stress distribution, it does not provide design values, it is widely acknowledged as a valuable tool for comparison. Even so, comparing different aspects of composite welded joints through their corresponding SLS strength values alone can be deceptive. This paper shows that comparison of different welding processes, adherend materials, process parameters or different types of joining techniques through SLS testing is only meaningful when strength values are combined with knowledge on other aspects of the joints such as joint mesostructure, failure modes and joint mechanics. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'A cracking approach to inventing new tough materials: fracture stranger than friction'.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20200296
Pages (from-to)20200296
Number of pages1
JournalPhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences
Volume379
Issue number2203
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • induction welding
  • mechanical fastening
  • mechanical testing
  • resistance welding
  • thermoplastic composites
  • ultrasonic welding

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The dangers of single-lap shear testing in understanding polymer composite welded joints'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this