Abstract
The use of drones for applications such as package delivery, in an urban setting, would result in traffic densities that are orders of magnitude higher than any observed in manned aviation. Such densities not only make automated conflict detection and resolution a necessity, but it will also force a reevaluation of aspects such as centralised vs. distributed, coordination vs. priority, or state vs. intent. This paper investigates the use of intent in tactical conflict detection and resolution at high traffic densities in unmanned aviation. Experimental results show that combining both current state and future intent information improved overall safety. Adding intent enables the detection, in advance, of conflicts resulting from future changes of state. A conflict resolution maneuver is optimal for safety when all aircraft deviate only minimally from their current state to solve the conflict. Consequently, they could deviate from the broadcast intent information. Therefore, state projection into the future must still be kept to prevent very short-term conflicts when intruders do not follow their original intent.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | ICRAT 2020 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Event | ICRAT 2020: International conference on research in air transportation - Virtual/online event due to COVID-19 Duration: 15 Sept 2020 → 15 Sept 2020 Conference number: 9 http://www.icrat.org/icrat/upcoming-conference/committee-members/ |
Conference
Conference | ICRAT 2020: International conference on research in air transportation |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | ICRAT 2020 |
Period | 15/09/20 → 15/09/20 |
Internet address |
Bibliographical note
Virtual/online event due to COVID-19Keywords
- Conflict Detection and Resolution (CD&R)
- Trajectory Intent
- Space Solution Diagram (SSD)
- U-Space
- Unmanned Traffic Management (UTM)
- Self-Separation
- ASAS
- Sense & Avoid
- Drones