TY - JOUR
T1 - The Influence of Floating Turbine Dynamics on the Helix Wake Mixing Method
AU - van den Berg, D.G.
AU - De Tavernier, Delphine
AU - Gutknecht, Jonas
AU - Viré, Axelle
AU - Van Wingerden, Jan Willem
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Wake mixing techniques like the Helix have shown to be effective at reducing the wake interaction between turbines, which improves wind farm power production. When these techniques are applied to a floating turbine it will excite movement. The type and magnitude of movement are dependent on floater dynamics. This work investigates four different floating turbines. Of these four turbines, two are optimised variants of the TripleSpar and Softwind platforms with enhanced yaw motion. The other two are the unaltered versions of these platforms. When the Helix is applied to all four floating turbines, the increased yaw motion of the optimised TripleSpar results in a reduction in windspeed whereas the optimised Softwind sees an increase in windspeed with increased yaw motion. From simulations using prescribed yaw motion at different phase offsets between blade pitch and yaw motion, we can conclude that this is the driving factor for this difference.
AB - Wake mixing techniques like the Helix have shown to be effective at reducing the wake interaction between turbines, which improves wind farm power production. When these techniques are applied to a floating turbine it will excite movement. The type and magnitude of movement are dependent on floater dynamics. This work investigates four different floating turbines. Of these four turbines, two are optimised variants of the TripleSpar and Softwind platforms with enhanced yaw motion. The other two are the unaltered versions of these platforms. When the Helix is applied to all four floating turbines, the increased yaw motion of the optimised TripleSpar results in a reduction in windspeed whereas the optimised Softwind sees an increase in windspeed with increased yaw motion. From simulations using prescribed yaw motion at different phase offsets between blade pitch and yaw motion, we can conclude that this is the driving factor for this difference.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196365438&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1742-6596/2767/3/032012
DO - 10.1088/1742-6596/2767/3/032012
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85196365438
SN - 1742-6588
VL - 2767
JO - Journal of Physics: Conference Series
JF - Journal of Physics: Conference Series
IS - 3
M1 - 032012
T2 - 2024 Science of Making Torque from Wind, TORQUE 2024
Y2 - 29 May 2024 through 31 May 2024
ER -