The potential impact of Google Maps on mode choices: Evidence from a stated preference experiment

Stefanie Peer*, Françeska Tomori, Ben Wagner, Till Winkler

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the potential influence of digital mapping tools (with Google Maps as the primary example) on mode choice behavior. For the purpose of this study, we use survey data gathered in Vienna (Austria) during 2022. Almost 80% of respondents state that they regularly use Google Maps, and a large majority evaluate Google Maps positively concerning ease of use, trust, or general usefulness. Our analyses reveal that, on average, respondents perceive real-life travel times as somewhat longer than the corresponding Google-Maps-based travel times (by 2%–11%). However, a large degree of heterogeneity is present, which seems to be at least partially driven by respondents’ speed choices. Based on a stated preference experiment, in which respondents were asked to choose between transport modes, assuming that the travel times stated in the experiment either originate from Google Maps (GoogleMaps treatment) or correspond to accurately measured average travel times (Baseline treatment), we can show that the perceived differences between real-life travel times and Google-Maps-based travel times are only considered to a limited extent in the mode choices. More specifically, such deviations are mainly acted upon when individuals expect to be faster than the Google Maps estimate.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101560
JournalTransportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Volume33
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Digital mapping tools
  • Google maps
  • Mobility apps
  • Mode choice
  • Stated preference
  • Travel time perceptions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The potential impact of Google Maps on mode choices: Evidence from a stated preference experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this