The State of Pilot Study Reporting in Crowdsourcing: A Reflection on Best Practices and Guidelines

Jonas Oppenlaender, Tahir Abbas, Ujwal Gadiraju

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

101 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Pilot studies are an essential cornerstone of the design of crowdsourcing campaigns, yet they are often only mentioned in passing in the scholarly literature. A lack of details surrounding pilot studies in crowdsourcing research hinders the replication of studies and the reproduction of findings, stalling potential scientific advances. We conducted a systematic literature review on the current state of pilot study reporting at the intersection of crowdsourcing and HCI research. Our review of ten years of literature included 171 articles published in the proceedings of the Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (AAAI HCOMP) and the ACM Digital Library. We found that pilot studies in crowdsourcing research (i.e., crowd pilot studies) are often under-reported in the literature. Important details, such as the number of workers and rewards to workers, are often not reported. On the basis of our findings, we reflect on the current state of practice and formulate a set of best practice guidelines for reporting crowd pilot studies in crowdsourcing research. We also provide implications for the design of crowdsourcing platforms and make practical suggestions for supporting crowd pilot study reporting.
Original languageEnglish
Article number184
Number of pages45
JournalProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Volume8
Issue numberCSCW1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • crowdsourcing
  • pilot studies
  • systematic literature review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The State of Pilot Study Reporting in Crowdsourcing: A Reflection on Best Practices and Guidelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this