The ulnar collateral ligament loading paradox between in-vitro and in-vivo studies on baseball pitching (narrative review)

Bart Van Trigt*, Liset Vliegen, Ton Leenen, H.E.J. Veeger

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) weakening or tears occur in 16% of professional baseball pitchers. To prevent players from sustaining a UCL injury, it is important to understand the relationship between the UCL properties and elbow stabilizers with the load on the UCL during pitching. In-vitro studies showed that the ultimate external valgus torque of 34 Nm would rupture the UCL, which is in apparent conflict with the reported peak valgus torques in pitching (40–120 Nm). Assuming both observations are correct, the question rises why ‘only’ 16 out of 100 professional pitchers sustain a UCL rupture. Underestimation of the effect of other structures in in-vivo studies is most likely the explanation of this mismatch because the calculated in-vivo torque also includes possible contributions of functional and structural stabilizers. In-vitro studies show that the flexor-pronator mass has the potential to counteract valgus torque directly, whereas the elbow flexor-extensor muscles combined with the humeroradial joint might have an indirect effect on valgus torque by increasing the joint compression force. Accurate experimental electromyography data and a more detailed (musculoskeletal)mechanical model of the elbow are needed to investigate if and to what extent the structural and functional stabilizers can shield the UCL during pitching.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-29
JournalInternational Biomechanics
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • elbow injury
  • electromyography; Tommy John Surgery;
  • musculoskeletal modelling
  • overhead sports
  • UCL

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The ulnar collateral ligament loading paradox between in-vitro and in-vivo studies on baseball pitching (narrative review)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this