Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Towards a classification system for Modernist painters’ reworking practices illustrated by James Ensor’s revised paintings

Annelies Rios Casier*, Herwig Todts, Karen Bonne, Maron Zwakman, Letizia Monico, Patrick Atkinson, Michela Botticelli, Matthias Alfeld, Francisca Vandepitte, More Authors

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Reworking paintings has been a common practice throughout art history, with artists modifying their own work at various stages and occasionally altering pieces by others. Advances in chemical imaging and increased access to traditional imaging techniques have facilitated the documentation of such interventions. Initially focused on Old Masters, research on reworking practices has expanded to nineteenth- and twentieth-century artists. For the first time, a classification system for reworkings is introduced, based on the oeuvre of Belgian Modernist painter James Ensor (1860–1949). Five representative case studies each illustrate one of the proposed types of reworking: (1) pentimenti, (2) post-factum revisions, (3) recycled works, (4) metamorphoses, and (5) appropriations. Using advanced imaging and spectroscopic techniques, including Macro X-Ray Fluorescence (MA-XRF) and instrumentation from the Iperion HS consortium, the study also provides material-technical evidence of Ensor’s experimental studio practice while shedding new light on anachronisms in his oeuvre.

Original languageEnglish
Article number411
Number of pages15
Journalnpj Heritage Science
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards a classification system for Modernist painters’ reworking practices illustrated by James Ensor’s revised paintings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this