TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards Cr(VI)-free anodization of aluminum alloys for aerospace adhesive bonding applications
T2 - A review
AU - Abrahami, Shoshan T.
AU - de Kok, John M.M.
AU - Terryn, Herman
AU - Mol, J.M.C.
N1 - Accepted Author Manuscript
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - For more than six decades, chromic acid anodizing (CAA) has been the central process in the surface pre-treatment of aluminum for adhesively bonded aircraft structures. Unfortunately, this electrolyte contains hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)), a compound known for its toxicity and carcinogenic properties. To comply with the new strict international regulations, the Cr(VI)-era will soon have to come to an end. Anodizing aluminum in acid electrolytes produces a self-ordered porous oxide layer. Although different acids can be used to create this type of structure, the excellent adhesion and corrosion resistance that is currently achieved by the complete Cr(VI)-based process is not easily matched. This paper provides a critical overview and appraisal of proposed alternatives to CAA, including combinations of multiple anodizing steps, pre- and post anodizing treatments. The work is presented in terms of the modifications to the oxide properties, such as morphological features (e.g., pore size, barrier layer thickness) and surface chemistry, in order to evaluate the link between fundamental principles of adhesion and bond performance.[Figure not available: see fulltext.]
AB - For more than six decades, chromic acid anodizing (CAA) has been the central process in the surface pre-treatment of aluminum for adhesively bonded aircraft structures. Unfortunately, this electrolyte contains hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)), a compound known for its toxicity and carcinogenic properties. To comply with the new strict international regulations, the Cr(VI)-era will soon have to come to an end. Anodizing aluminum in acid electrolytes produces a self-ordered porous oxide layer. Although different acids can be used to create this type of structure, the excellent adhesion and corrosion resistance that is currently achieved by the complete Cr(VI)-based process is not easily matched. This paper provides a critical overview and appraisal of proposed alternatives to CAA, including combinations of multiple anodizing steps, pre- and post anodizing treatments. The work is presented in terms of the modifications to the oxide properties, such as morphological features (e.g., pore size, barrier layer thickness) and surface chemistry, in order to evaluate the link between fundamental principles of adhesion and bond performance.[Figure not available: see fulltext.]
KW - adhesive bonding
KW - aluminum
KW - anodizing
KW - Cr(VI)-free
KW - surface pre-treatments
UR - http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:1e54f4f4-ede4-47ea-a7f9-2248124fd507
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019176215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11705-017-1641-3
DO - 10.1007/s11705-017-1641-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85019176215
VL - 11
SP - 465
EP - 482
JO - Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering
JF - Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering
SN - 2095-0179
IS - 3
ER -