Transversing Formalisms

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialScientificpeer-review

    22 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In the editorial introduction of this issue of Footprint, the question of architectural form is approached from a population of minor perspectives. Inspired by Bateson’s metalogues, the authors wish to bring forward multiple questions on architectural form instead of a single generalizing one: from ‘what is form’ to ‘how, when, where and why is form’. In this respect, they examine the ways for a possible reconciliation between the genetic and the generic, between the discursive outlines of various formalisms, opting for an approach that is both syncretic and transversal. Committed to architectural form, they conclude by claiming that it stands for much more than simply a concept. Form, in its ambiguity and heterogeneity, stands for a shared problem, one that brings together disciplines, schools of thought and variant methodological practices, turning therefore the discursive constraints of the past in productive chances for the future.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-6
    Number of pages6
    JournalFootprint
    Volume12
    Issue number1 #22
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 30 Apr 2018

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Transversing Formalisms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this