Unveiling the consequences of your breach growth model choice

Patrik Peeters; M. Heredia Gomez; Myron van Damme; Paul Visser

doi:10.1051/e3sconf/20160703005

Unveiling the consequences of your breach growth model choice

Patrik Peeters, M. Heredia Gomez, Myron van Damme, Paul Visser

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volume › Conference contribution › Scientific › peer-review

54 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Within the frame work of the realisation of the ‘Sigmaplan’ for the river Schelde in Flanders (Belgium), a large-scale dike breaching experiment following overflow was held at Lillo (Antwerp) in 2012. The outcomes of the breach test serve to unveil the impact of a chosen breach growth model, to set application limits, to come up with guidelines for proper selection and usage of the model to be applied.

Breach growth models are used to predict the breach dimensions and to estimate the flow through the breach. All assessed models pretty well succeed in this. However, starting from various premises and taking into account a (limited) set of different breaching mechanisms, the use of today’s state-of-the-art breach growth models is not entirely trouble free

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Flood Risk 2016
Subtitle of host publication	3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management, Lyon, France. Lyon, France, October 17-21, 2016
Editors	M. Lang, F. Klijn, P. Samuels
Publisher	EDP Science
Pages	1-5
Number of pages	5
Volume	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160703005
Publication status	Published - 2016
Event	3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management, FLOODrisk 2016 - Lyon Convention Centre, Lyon, France Duration: 17 Oct 2016 → 21 Oct 2016 Conference number: 3 http://floodrisk2016.net/

Publication series

Name	E3S Web of Conferences
Publisher	EDP Science
Number	03005
Volume	7
ISSN (Print)	2267-1242

Conference

Conference	3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management, FLOODrisk 2016
Abbreviated title	FLOODrisk 2016
Country/Territory	France
City	Lyon
Period	17/10/16 → 21/10/16
Internet address	http://floodrisk2016.net/

Access to Document

10.1051/e3sconf/20160703005

e3sconf_flood2016_03005Final published version, 775 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

Peeters, P., Heredia Gomez, M., van Damme, M., & Visser, P. (2016). Unveiling the consequences of your breach growth model choice. In M. Lang, F. Klijn, & P. Samuels (Eds.), Flood Risk 2016: 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management, Lyon, France. Lyon, France, October 17-21, 2016 (Vol. 7, pp. 1-5). (E3S Web of Conferences; Vol. 7, No. 03005). EDP Science. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160703005

@inproceedings{01013344d3e84b44b59f5e63ee8d1fa7,

title = "Unveiling the consequences of your breach growth model choice",

abstract = "Within the frame work of the realisation of the {\textquoteleft}Sigmaplan{\textquoteright} for the river Schelde in Flanders (Belgium), a large-scale dike breaching experiment following overflow was held at Lillo (Antwerp) in 2012. The outcomes of the breach test serve to unveil the impact of a chosen breach growth model, to set application limits, to come up with guidelines for proper selection and usage of the model to be applied.Breach growth models are used to predict the breach dimensions and to estimate the flow through the breach. All assessed models pretty well succeed in this. However, starting from various premises and taking into account a (limited) set of different breaching mechanisms, the use of today{\textquoteright}s state-of-the-art breach growth models is not entirely trouble free",

author = "Patrik Peeters and {Heredia Gomez}, M. and {van Damme}, Myron and Paul Visser",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1051/e3sconf/20160703005",

language = "English",

volume = "7",

series = "E3S Web of Conferences",

publisher = "EDP Science",

number = "03005",

pages = "1--5",

editor = "M. Lang and F. Klijn and P. Samuels",

booktitle = "Flood Risk 2016",

note = "3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management, FLOODrisk 2016, FLOODrisk 2016 ; Conference date: 17-10-2016 Through 21-10-2016",

url = "http://floodrisk2016.net/",

}

Peeters, P, Heredia Gomez, M, van Damme, M & Visser, P 2016, Unveiling the consequences of your breach growth model choice. in M Lang, F Klijn & P Samuels (eds), Flood Risk 2016: 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management, Lyon, France. Lyon, France, October 17-21, 2016. vol. 7, E3S Web of Conferences, no. 03005, vol. 7, EDP Science, pp. 1-5, 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management, FLOODrisk 2016, Lyon, France, 17/10/16. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160703005

Unveiling the consequences of your breach growth model choice. / Peeters, Patrik; Heredia Gomez, M.; van Damme, Myron et al.
Flood Risk 2016: 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management, Lyon, France. Lyon, France, October 17-21, 2016. ed. / M. Lang; F. Klijn; P. Samuels. Vol. 7 EDP Science, 2016. p. 1-5 (E3S Web of Conferences; Vol. 7, No. 03005).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volume › Conference contribution › Scientific › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Unveiling the consequences of your breach growth model choice

AU - Peeters, Patrik

AU - Heredia Gomez, M.

AU - van Damme, Myron

AU - Visser, Paul

N1 - Conference code: 3

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Within the frame work of the realisation of the ‘Sigmaplan’ for the river Schelde in Flanders (Belgium), a large-scale dike breaching experiment following overflow was held at Lillo (Antwerp) in 2012. The outcomes of the breach test serve to unveil the impact of a chosen breach growth model, to set application limits, to come up with guidelines for proper selection and usage of the model to be applied.Breach growth models are used to predict the breach dimensions and to estimate the flow through the breach. All assessed models pretty well succeed in this. However, starting from various premises and taking into account a (limited) set of different breaching mechanisms, the use of today’s state-of-the-art breach growth models is not entirely trouble free

AB - Within the frame work of the realisation of the ‘Sigmaplan’ for the river Schelde in Flanders (Belgium), a large-scale dike breaching experiment following overflow was held at Lillo (Antwerp) in 2012. The outcomes of the breach test serve to unveil the impact of a chosen breach growth model, to set application limits, to come up with guidelines for proper selection and usage of the model to be applied.Breach growth models are used to predict the breach dimensions and to estimate the flow through the breach. All assessed models pretty well succeed in this. However, starting from various premises and taking into account a (limited) set of different breaching mechanisms, the use of today’s state-of-the-art breach growth models is not entirely trouble free

UR - http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:01013344-d3e8-4b44-b59f-5e63ee8d1fa7

U2 - 10.1051/e3sconf/20160703005

DO - 10.1051/e3sconf/20160703005

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 7

T3 - E3S Web of Conferences

SP - 1

EP - 5

BT - Flood Risk 2016

A2 - Lang, M.

A2 - Klijn, F.

A2 - Samuels, P.

PB - EDP Science

T2 - 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management, FLOODrisk 2016

Y2 - 17 October 2016 through 21 October 2016

ER -

Peeters P, Heredia Gomez M, van Damme M , Visser P. Unveiling the consequences of your breach growth model choice. In Lang M, Klijn F, Samuels P, editors, Flood Risk 2016: 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management, Lyon, France. Lyon, France, October 17-21, 2016. Vol. 7. EDP Science. 2016. p. 1-5. (E3S Web of Conferences; 03005). doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/20160703005

Unveiling the consequences of your breach growth model choice

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this