TY - JOUR
T1 - Using co-creation methods for research integrity guideline development
T2 - How, what, why and when?
AU - Labib, Krishma
AU - Pizzolato, Daniel
AU - Stappers, P.J.
AU - Evans, Natalie
AU - Lechner, Iris
AU - Widdershoven, Guy
AU - Bouter, Lex
AU - Diericks, Chris
AU - Bergema, Katinka
AU - Tijdink, Joeri
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Existing research integrity (RI) guideline development methods are limited in including various perspectives. While co-creation methods could help to address this, there is little information available to researchers and practitioners on how, why and when to use co-creation for developing RI guidelines, nor what the outcomes of co-creation methods are. In this paper, we aim to address this gap. First, we discuss how co-creation methods can be used for RI guideline development, based on our experience of developing RI guidelines. We elaborate on steps including preparation of the aims and design; participant sensitization; organizing and facilitating workshops; and analyzing data and translating them into guidelines. Secondly, we present the resulting RI guidelines, to show what the outcome of co-creation methods are.Thirdly, we reflect on why and when researchers might want to use co-creation methods for developing RI guidelines. We discuss that stakeholder engagement and inclusion of diverse perspectives are key strengths of co-creation methods. We also reflect that co-creation methods have the potential to make guidelines implementable if followed by additional steps such as revision working groups. We conclude that co-creation methods are a valuable approach to creating new RI guidelines when used together with additional methods.
AB - Existing research integrity (RI) guideline development methods are limited in including various perspectives. While co-creation methods could help to address this, there is little information available to researchers and practitioners on how, why and when to use co-creation for developing RI guidelines, nor what the outcomes of co-creation methods are. In this paper, we aim to address this gap. First, we discuss how co-creation methods can be used for RI guideline development, based on our experience of developing RI guidelines. We elaborate on steps including preparation of the aims and design; participant sensitization; organizing and facilitating workshops; and analyzing data and translating them into guidelines. Secondly, we present the resulting RI guidelines, to show what the outcome of co-creation methods are.Thirdly, we reflect on why and when researchers might want to use co-creation methods for developing RI guidelines. We discuss that stakeholder engagement and inclusion of diverse perspectives are key strengths of co-creation methods. We also reflect that co-creation methods have the potential to make guidelines implementable if followed by additional steps such as revision working groups. We conclude that co-creation methods are a valuable approach to creating new RI guidelines when used together with additional methods.
KW - co-creation
KW - guideline development
KW - online research methods
KW - research integrity
KW - research policy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146318196&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08989621.2022.2154154
DO - 10.1080/08989621.2022.2154154
M3 - Article
SN - 0898-9621
VL - 31 (2024)
SP - 531
EP - 556
JO - Accountability in Research
JF - Accountability in Research
IS - 6
ER -