Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What Counts when it Comes to Salary? A Qualitative Analysis of the Arguments Dutch Citizens Use when Distributing Salary

Jael Bootsma, Irene van de Glind, Roos Mulder, Agnes Akkerman*, Evelyn Finnema, Lex Heerma van Voss, Tom Geijsen, Niek Mouter, Geertje van de Ven

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This study examines to what extent job evaluation systems align with public views on fair pay. Using a Participatory Value Evaluation, over 3,700 Dutch citizens distributed extra salary among various jobs and explained their choices. The arguments were compared to criteria used in job evaluation systems. The dimensions prioritized by participants, such as required education, job complexity, and working conditions, are already well represented in current formal job evaluation systems. However, participants also stressed aspects often absent from such systems, including a job’s societal contribution and labour market scarcity. While job evaluation systems remain broadly consistent with public reasoning, we recommend initiating broader public and institutional discussions on the evolving values that underpin fair compensation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCompensation and Benefits Review
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2026

Keywords

  • empirical research
  • fair pay
  • formal pay systems
  • job evaluation systems
  • pay practice
  • public opinion
  • salary

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What Counts when it Comes to Salary? A Qualitative Analysis of the Arguments Dutch Citizens Use when Distributing Salary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this