%PDF-1.5
%
1 0 obj
<<
/Metadata 2 0 R
/Names 3 0 R
/OpenAction 4 0 R
/Outlines 5 0 R
/PageMode /UseNone
/Pages 6 0 R
/Type /Catalog
/ViewerPreferences <<
/FitWindow true
>>
>>
endobj
7 0 obj
<<
/Author (Wouter Jan Klerk, Timo Schweckendiek, Frank den Heijer and Matthijs Kok)
/CreationDate (D:20190830183400+08'00')
/Creator (LaTeX with hyperref package)
/Keywords (asset management; flood defences; levee; dike; structural health monitoring; Bayesian decision model; value of information)
/ModDate (D:20200130141637+01'00')
/PTEX.Fullbanner (This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.18 \(TeX Live 2017/W32TeX\) kpathsea version 6.2.3)
/Producer (pdfTeX-1.40.18)
/Subject (One of the most rapidly emerging measures in infrastructure asset management is Structural Health Monitoring \(SHM\), which aims at reducing uncertainty in structural performance by using monitoring equipment. As earthen flood defence structures typically have large strength uncertainties, such techniques can be particularly promising. However, insight in the key characteristics for successful SHM for flood defences is lacking, which hampers the practical implementation. In this study, we explore the benefits of pore pressure monitoring, one of the most promising SHM techniques for earthen flood defences. The approach is based on a Bayesian pre-posterior analysis, and results are evaluated based on the Value of Information \(VoI\) obtained from different monitoring strategies. We specifically investigate the effect on long-term reinforcement decisions. The results show that, next to the relative magnitude of reducible uncertainty, the combination of the probability of having a useful observation and the duration of a SHM effort determine the VoI. As it is likely that increasing loads due to climate change will result in more frequent future reinforcements, the influence of scenarios of different rates of increase in future loads is also investigated. It was found that, in all considered possible scenarios, monitoring yields a positive Value of Information, hence it is an economically efficient measure for flood defence asset management both now and in the future. )
/Title (Value of Information of Structural Health Monitoring in Asset Management of Flood Defences)
/Trapped /False
>>
endobj
2 0 obj
<<
/Length 5628
/Subtype /XML
/Type /Metadata
>>
stream
application/pdf
Wouter Jan Klerk, Timo Schweckendiek, Frank den Heijer and Matthijs Kok
One of the most rapidly emerging measures in infrastructure asset management is Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), which aims at reducing uncertainty in structural performance by using monitoring equipment. As earthen flood defence structures typically have large strength uncertainties, such techniques can be particularly promising. However, insight in the key characteristics for successful SHM for flood defences is lacking, which hampers the practical implementation. In this study, we explore the benefits of pore pressure monitoring, one of the most promising SHM techniques for earthen flood defences. The approach is based on a Bayesian pre-posterior analysis, and results are evaluated based on the Value of Information (VoI) obtained from different monitoring strategies. We specifically investigate the effect on long-term reinforcement decisions. The results show that, next to the relative magnitude of reducible uncertainty, the combination of the probability of having a useful observation and the duration of a SHM effort determine the VoI. As it is likely that increasing loads due to climate change will result in more frequent future reinforcements, the influence of scenarios of different rates of increase in future loads is also investigated. It was found that, in all considered possible scenarios, monitoring yields a positive Value of Information, hence it is an economically efficient measure for flood defence asset management both now and in the future.
Value of Information of Structural Health Monitoring in Asset Management of Flood Defences
2019-08-30T18:34+08:00
LaTeX with hyperref package
2020-01-30T14:16:37+01:00
2020-01-30T14:16:37+01:00
asset management; flood defences; levee; dike; structural health monitoring; Bayesian decision model; value of information
pdfTeX-1.40.18
False
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.18 (TeX Live 2017/W32TeX) kpathsea version 6.2.3
uuid:ce5610db-616b-47e7-8c8f-d5bbf1d953b5
uuid:562e4350-ea1b-4ff3-a716-31159dfda233
endstream
endobj
3 0 obj
<<
/Dests 8 0 R
>>
endobj
4 0 obj
<<
/D [9 0 R /FitH]
/S /GoTo
>>
endobj
5 0 obj
<<
/Count 19
/First 10 0 R
/Last 11 0 R
/Type /Outlines
>>
endobj
6 0 obj
<<
/Count 21
/Kids [12 0 R 13 0 R 14 0 R 15 0 R]
/Type /Pages
>>
endobj
8 0 obj
<<
/Kids [16 0 R 17 0 R 18 0 R 19 0 R]
/Limits [(Doc-Start) (table.caption.3)]
>>
endobj
9 0 obj
<<
/Annots [20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R 23 0 R 24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R
30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R]
/Contents [35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R 40 0 R 41 0 R 42 0 R]
/CropBox [0 0 595.276 841.89]
/MediaBox [0 0 595.276 841.89]
/Parent 12 0 R
/Resources 43 0 R
/Rotate 0
/Type /Page
>>
endobj
10 0 obj
<<
/A 44 0 R
/Next 45 0 R
/Parent 5 0 R
/Title
>>
endobj
11 0 obj
<<
/A 46 0 R
/Parent 5 0 R
/Prev 47 0 R
/Title
>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<<
/Count 7
/Kids [48 0 R 9 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R]
/Parent 6 0 R
/Type /Pages
>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<<
/Count 6
/Kids [54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R]
/Parent 6 0 R
/Type /Pages
>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<<
/Count 6
/Kids [60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R 64 0 R 65 0 R]
/Parent 6 0 R
/Type /Pages
>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<<
/Count 2
/Kids [66 0 R 67 0 R]
/Parent 6 0 R
/Type /Pages
>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<<
/Kids [68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R 73 0 R]
/Limits [(Doc-Start) (cite.Raiffa1961)]
>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<<
/Kids [74 0 R 75 0 R 76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R]
/Limits [(cite.Schweckendiek2013HeadMon) (figure.caption.4)]
>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<<
/Kids [80 0 R 81 0 R 82 0 R 83 0 R 84 0 R 85 0 R]
/Limits [(figure.caption.5) (subsection.3.3)]
>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<<
/Kids [86 0 R 87 0 R]
/Limits [(subsection.3.4) (table.caption.3)]
>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/S /URI
/Type /Action
/URI (http://www.mdpi.com/journal/infrastructures)
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 1]
/H /I
/Rect [75.539 757.64 254.545 793.648]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
21 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/S /URI
/Type /Action
/URI (http://www.mdpi.com)
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 1]
/H /I
/Rect [474.736 757.64 519.737 793.648]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/S /URI
/Type /Action
/URI (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6777-2705)
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 1]
/H /I
/Rect [172.774 660.75 183.837 674.364]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/S /URI
/Type /Action
/URI (http://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/4/3/56?type=check_update&version=1)
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 1]
/H /I
/Rect [466.564 558.185 518.801 577.185]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
24 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/D (cite.Frangopol2015a)
/S /GoTo
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 0]
/H /I
/Rect [138.202 223.668 145.176 232.595]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/D (cite.ISO55000)
/S /GoTo
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 0]
/H /I
/Rect [271.578 210.159 278.552 219.085]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
26 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/D (cite.IAM2014)
/S /GoTo
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 0]
/H /I
/Rect [196.178 155.937 203.151 165.048]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/D (cite.Cagle2003)
/S /GoTo
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 0]
/H /I
/Rect [206.24 155.937 213.214 165.048]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
28 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/D (cite.Klerk2016Framework)
/S /GoTo
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 0]
/H /I
/Rect [204.175 142.612 211.149 151.538]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
29 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/D (cite.Frangopol2001)
/S /GoTo
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 0]
/H /I
/Rect [211.647 142.428 218.621 151.538]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
30 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/D (cite.Pandey2009)
/S /GoTo
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 0]
/H /I
/Rect [219.119 142.612 226.093 151.538]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
31 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/D (cite.Ko2005)
/S /GoTo
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 0]
/H /I
/Rect [454.642 88.39 461.616 97.501]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
32 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/D (cite.Thons2012)
/S /GoTo
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 0]
/H /I
/Rect [144.385 74.881 151.359 83.991]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
33 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/S /URI
/Type /Action
/URI (http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures4030056)
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 1]
/H /I
/Rect [179.628 38.684 292.006 50.141]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
34 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/S /URI
/Type /Action
/URI (http://www.mdpi.com/journal/infrastructures)
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 1]
/H /I
/Rect [374.076 38.684 519.737 50.141]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
35 0 obj
<<
/Length 529
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
HTM0WآfEK]nmjNhSBBosf>Z+ro^e\ PEv$ FRu'Q
E$pzݷ;Yصu=:kQ&sgl˞Scݹȩ&q1{W,bB>N8M)9Pz?a
K~:7n/_Nv)hujn+BMPmjgݪz
ٕSzv3.Rn0[:5@FK>`qcҭ+_YU((jF_<$cFk*44t_ *`
endstream
endobj
36 0 obj
<<
/Length 592
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
HMS0:,-L0GqT9_9!)aWv_=w>q1| E(0Mѝ&Eӭ&įvz7Ediu%Ց\e[c$ջ6P\-e Хh]3/-Dʝ-($@1>2rkUW/ .ߴOR?W\2Ƿ;%]<_
R4ʘm21
94iM >Pjͮ~Q3 ӫ퇝جZI9-~#Ӿ
r'CZ)tQa^vBVB29L$g̍ylR>AƉ<'hu|h$γ!OcBm(3w Xr-eiXo4u2ߩ3%VgGtpN͚BT裣ɥw{`(f)NJTGFLll7GBa14ΎbtV{?G).ԮJS4lS3+ʆ^q09(̣Y5Eٝ N
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<<
/Length 685
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
HlTr0LN3=4mq`(6+["!#ɒ+yTN)qUF$@]yC?FmOX+g!G[P7Iڜiv_ɔ`D(7%j7<.UTF![Skl7(y"L)b("%`yPu
$g; d=9ltM,9\q/&SIm܌ ؛6ChPWqzʊ /.]K?W&aBi?B®C>@EʀԌ@a=Mu}75ӑeԨ-D} e_IJ Y|BD=
lZiȇvezH{І#
L#9m08{e2Cn:Λ$ `D7=2N:i砌p!p} Ս+IR`z[х]]uD