Abstract
In my experience, the process of conducting architectural historical research is not smooth. It cannot be accurately planned in advance, or broken down into a precise schedule of hours to be spent in archives and libraries. It is a messy undertaking, an ungainly stumbling from one potential source of information to another, whereby unlikely connections are unearthed and dirty data are harvested. Cleaned up, cross-checked and organized into a narrative form, the ensuing collage is less the result of the rigorous proving of an objective hypothesis than an attempt to understand the significance of a portion of interwoven past realities that have been pasted together subjectively. As well as addressing the foibles of historical research, this work-in-progress paper attempts to address the consequences of some of the paradoxes such research can uncover.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | ABE Journal |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Externally published | Yes |