TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the life-cycle sustainability of algae and bacteria-based wastewater treatment systems
T2 - High-rate algae pond and sequencing batch reactor
AU - Kohlheb, Norbert
AU - van Afferden, Manfred
AU - Lara, Enrique
AU - Arbib, Zouhayr
AU - Conthe, Monica
AU - Poitzsch, Christoph
AU - Marquardt, Thomas
AU - Becker, Mi Yong
N1 - Accepted Author Manuscript
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - High Rate Algae Ponds (HRAPs) are a promising technology for the treatment of municipal wastewater in locations with sufficient space and solar radiation. Algae-based processes do not require aeration, and thus have the potential to be less energy-intensive than activated sludge processes. We used a combination of LCA and LCCA analysis to evaluate the sustainability of HRAP systems, using data from the construction and operation of two demonstration-scale systems in Almería and Cádiz, Spain. As a reference for comparison, we used data from an activated sludge-based Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) treatment system in operation in Leppersdorf, Germany, which has comparable removal rates for a similar inflow. We focused solely on the actual wastewater treatment aspect of these technologies, excluding sludge treatment from this analysis. Based on our analysis, the current HRAP technology is more energy-efficient than activated sludge-based SBRs and requires only 22% of its electricity consumption. In addition, HRAP is more advantageous both economically (0.18 €/m3 versus 0.26 €/m3) and environmentally, with both lower global warming and eutrophication potentials (146.27 vs. 458.27 × 10−3 kg CO2 equiv./m3; 126.14 vs. 158.01 × 10−6 kg PO4 equiv./m3). However, the Net Environmental Benefit of SBR was slightly more favorable than of HRAP because of the higher removal rate for nutrients of SBR.
AB - High Rate Algae Ponds (HRAPs) are a promising technology for the treatment of municipal wastewater in locations with sufficient space and solar radiation. Algae-based processes do not require aeration, and thus have the potential to be less energy-intensive than activated sludge processes. We used a combination of LCA and LCCA analysis to evaluate the sustainability of HRAP systems, using data from the construction and operation of two demonstration-scale systems in Almería and Cádiz, Spain. As a reference for comparison, we used data from an activated sludge-based Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) treatment system in operation in Leppersdorf, Germany, which has comparable removal rates for a similar inflow. We focused solely on the actual wastewater treatment aspect of these technologies, excluding sludge treatment from this analysis. Based on our analysis, the current HRAP technology is more energy-efficient than activated sludge-based SBRs and requires only 22% of its electricity consumption. In addition, HRAP is more advantageous both economically (0.18 €/m3 versus 0.26 €/m3) and environmentally, with both lower global warming and eutrophication potentials (146.27 vs. 458.27 × 10−3 kg CO2 equiv./m3; 126.14 vs. 158.01 × 10−6 kg PO4 equiv./m3). However, the Net Environmental Benefit of SBR was slightly more favorable than of HRAP because of the higher removal rate for nutrients of SBR.
KW - High rate algae pond
KW - Life cycle assessment
KW - Life cycle costing
KW - Sequencing batch reactor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082584554&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110459
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110459
M3 - Article
C2 - 32250893
SN - 0301-4797
VL - 264
JO - Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Management
M1 - 110459
ER -