Building blocks for a cognitive science-led epistemology of arithmetic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In recent years philosophers have used results from cognitive science to formulate epistemologies of arithmetic (e.g. Giaquinto in J Philos 98(1):5–18, 2001). Such epistemologies have, however, been criticised, e.g. by Azzouni (Talking about nothing: numbers, hallucinations and fictions, Oxford University Press, 2010), for interpreting the capacities found by cognitive science in an overly numerical way. I offer an alternative framework for the way these psychological processes can be combined, forming the basis for an epistemology for arithmetic. The resulting framework avoids assigning numerical content to the Approximate Number System and Object Tracking System, two systems that have so far been the basis of epistemologies of arithmetic informed by cognitive science. The resulting account is, however, only a framework for an epistemology: in the final part of the paper I argue that it is compatible with both platonist and nominalist views of numbers by fitting it into an epistemology for ante rem structuralism and one for fictionalism. Unsurprisingly, cognitive science does not settle the debate between these positions in the philosophy of mathematics, but I it can be used to refine existing epistemologies and restrict our focus to the capacities that cognitive science has found to underly our mathematical knowledge.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages18
JournalPhilosophical Studies
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Approximate number system
  • Epistemology of arithmetic
  • Naturalistic epistemology
  • Number acquisition
  • Philosophy of arithmetic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Building blocks for a cognitive science-led epistemology of arithmetic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this