Combining accessibilities for different activity types: Methodology and case study

Lijuan Zheng, Bert van Wee, Markus Oeser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Accessibility is a key concept in transport planning. Most studies only focus on specific activity types, but for policy making it is more relevant to aggregate accessibility overall or at least several activity types. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no study that combines accessibilities for different activity types. Since access to spatially separated activities is one dimension of quality of life, and activity types are not equally important for quality of life, we propose a methodology that is based on weighing activity types according to their relative importance to quality of life to assess overall accessibility. Four principles are adopted to develop the weighting factors: 1) the human needs the activity types satisfy; 2) the activity types' contribution to quality of life; 3) the activity types' trip frequency; 4) further modifications, based on principles such as whether the activity types are needed in emergent situations, and social values and policy preferences. We combine these four principles and apply the methodology in a case study focused on Germany.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)853-872
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Transport and Land Use
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Combining accessibilities for different activity types: Methodology and case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this