TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing social life cycle assessment based on corporate social responsibility
T2 - A chemical process industry case regarding human rights
AU - Tsalidis, Georgios Archimidis
AU - de Santo, Elena
AU - Gallart, Jose Jorge Espí
AU - Corberá, Joan Berzosa
AU - Blanco, Frederic Clarens
AU - Pesch, Udo
AU - Korevaar, Gijsbert
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - MSocial Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) uses a life cycle perspective to assess social impacts of products, and the S-LCA guidelines describe developing the system boundaries based on a factory-level perspective. However, such a perspective may exclude stakeholders with a negative social performance which are cooperating with a factory but are not directly involved with the product under study, and it can result in a step back on corporate social responsibility (CSR). Our study aimed to align S-LCA with the CSR concept. Therefore, we designed a case study for the manufacturing sector in which we practiced expanding the system boundaries of S-LCA. Our results showed larger social risks after expanding the system boundaries due to subsidiary and supplier companies located in countries with less strict regulations than the Netherlands, which is where the main organizations and parent company existed. We conclude that system boundaries expansion can result in more complete picture of the involved organizations, and lead practitioners to approach S-LCA with the goal of improving social conditions and identify companies which deserve excellent or poor social scores. Its usefulness is mostly expected when S-LCA practitioners aim to identify social hotspots in supply chains in socially sensitive markets.
AB - MSocial Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) uses a life cycle perspective to assess social impacts of products, and the S-LCA guidelines describe developing the system boundaries based on a factory-level perspective. However, such a perspective may exclude stakeholders with a negative social performance which are cooperating with a factory but are not directly involved with the product under study, and it can result in a step back on corporate social responsibility (CSR). Our study aimed to align S-LCA with the CSR concept. Therefore, we designed a case study for the manufacturing sector in which we practiced expanding the system boundaries of S-LCA. Our results showed larger social risks after expanding the system boundaries due to subsidiary and supplier companies located in countries with less strict regulations than the Netherlands, which is where the main organizations and parent company existed. We conclude that system boundaries expansion can result in more complete picture of the involved organizations, and lead practitioners to approach S-LCA with the goal of improving social conditions and identify companies which deserve excellent or poor social scores. Its usefulness is mostly expected when S-LCA practitioners aim to identify social hotspots in supply chains in socially sensitive markets.
KW - Corporate social responsibility
KW - Human rights
KW - Parental liability
KW - Social life cycle assessment
KW - Subsidiary
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098942165&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120564
DO - 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120564
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85098942165
SN - 0040-1625
VL - 165
JO - Technological Forecasting and Social Change
JF - Technological Forecasting and Social Change
IS - 120564
M1 - 120564
ER -