TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of probe size on phase-detection probe measurements of air-water flow properties in hydraulic jumps
AU - Shi, Rui
AU - Wüthrich, Davide
AU - Chanson, Hubert
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - This experimental study investigated the air-water flow properties and bubble characteristics in hydraulic jumps with Froude numbers Fr1 = 2.4 and 6.3, using four dual-tip phase detection probes with sensor sizes from 0.25 mm to 0.64 mm. The hydraulic jumps were characterized by a fully breaking roller with substantial air entrainment and turbulent two-phase flow patterns. The measurements encompassed distributions of void fraction, bubble count rate, interfacial velocity and bubble clustering properties and the data sets were consistent with previous studies. The comparison of the different probes showed a small impact of the tested sensor sizes on the air-water flow properties, in terms of the trends, magnitude and maximum values. Some differences were observed in terms of the bubble count rate, with the larger probes detecting a lesser number of bubbles. The trend was further confirmed through a comparison with the data set of Chanson and Brattberg (2000) [10] with a smaller probe sensor size (Ø1 = 0.025 mm), in which the maxima of bubble count rates were almost twice that of the present dataset for identical flow conditions. The present results confirm that the traditional signal processing techniques can be used for relatively small probe sizes, although different approaches might be needed for larger probes which cannot detect sub-millimetric bubbles. Overall, the findings should facilitate the development of sturdier phase-detection needle probes and help breaching the gap between laboratory and prototype.
AB - This experimental study investigated the air-water flow properties and bubble characteristics in hydraulic jumps with Froude numbers Fr1 = 2.4 and 6.3, using four dual-tip phase detection probes with sensor sizes from 0.25 mm to 0.64 mm. The hydraulic jumps were characterized by a fully breaking roller with substantial air entrainment and turbulent two-phase flow patterns. The measurements encompassed distributions of void fraction, bubble count rate, interfacial velocity and bubble clustering properties and the data sets were consistent with previous studies. The comparison of the different probes showed a small impact of the tested sensor sizes on the air-water flow properties, in terms of the trends, magnitude and maximum values. Some differences were observed in terms of the bubble count rate, with the larger probes detecting a lesser number of bubbles. The trend was further confirmed through a comparison with the data set of Chanson and Brattberg (2000) [10] with a smaller probe sensor size (Ø1 = 0.025 mm), in which the maxima of bubble count rates were almost twice that of the present dataset for identical flow conditions. The present results confirm that the traditional signal processing techniques can be used for relatively small probe sizes, although different approaches might be needed for larger probes which cannot detect sub-millimetric bubbles. Overall, the findings should facilitate the development of sturdier phase-detection needle probes and help breaching the gap between laboratory and prototype.
KW - Air–water flow properties
KW - Hydraulic jump
KW - Phase detection conductivity probes
KW - Physical modelling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175574500&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2023.102479
DO - 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2023.102479
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85175574500
SN - 0955-5986
VL - 94
JO - Flow Measurement and Instrumentation
JF - Flow Measurement and Instrumentation
M1 - 102479
ER -