TY - JOUR
T1 - Elusive publics in energy projects
T2 - The politics of localness and energy democracy
AU - Pesch, Udo
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - In order to have the assessment of the local impacts of energy projects, decision-makers need to separate a local public from the wider public. From the starting point that ‘publics’ are so-called imaginaries, this perspective paper argues that the operationalisation of publics tends to impose concerns, motivations and capacities upon the members of both publics, expecting local publics to consider specific concerns, while wider publics are expected to attend generic interests. Moreover, methods to invite members from a local public to speak out on the acceptability of an energy project tend to ignore the heterogeneity and dynamics of the ‘public’, compromising the democratic legitimacy of an assessment made by such a local public.
AB - In order to have the assessment of the local impacts of energy projects, decision-makers need to separate a local public from the wider public. From the starting point that ‘publics’ are so-called imaginaries, this perspective paper argues that the operationalisation of publics tends to impose concerns, motivations and capacities upon the members of both publics, expecting local publics to consider specific concerns, while wider publics are expected to attend generic interests. Moreover, methods to invite members from a local public to speak out on the acceptability of an energy project tend to ignore the heterogeneity and dynamics of the ‘public’, compromising the democratic legitimacy of an assessment made by such a local public.
KW - Energy democracy
KW - Energy projects
KW - Imaginaries
KW - Publics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067620350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101225
DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101225
M3 - Short survey
AN - SCOPUS:85067620350
VL - 56
JO - Energy Research and Social Science
JF - Energy Research and Social Science
SN - 2214-6296
M1 - 101225
ER -