How Places Speak: A Plea for Poetic Receptivity in Architectural Research

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeChapterScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    The traditional tools of architectural research, often foregrounding rational and formal modes of thinking, fail to address the fundamental ambiguities of architecture, such as the seemingly opposite notions subject-object. By developing a poetic way of writing as a mode of architectural investigation, such themes as biography, atmosphere and memory can be addressed. Echoing the words of Dutch phenomenologist Van den Berg, Bachelard stated that poets are capable of “noting that things ‘speak’ to them.” Poetry often starts from the simplest daily observations, in which architectural features such as materials, shapes, colors, smells, shapes, light and shadow, trigger associations and memories. It is the poet’s capacity to meticulously observe such details, and to be receptive to sudden connections between such details and human emotion. Through the close reading of a quote by Dutch poet Rutger Kopland and a poem by the author, this contribution will discuss how the receptive approach of poets offers valuable insights for architectural researchers to engage lived experience in their work.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationReading Architecture
    Subtitle of host publicationLiterary Imagination and Architectural Experience
    EditorsAngeliki Sioli, Yoonchun Jung
    Place of PublicationNew York
    PublisherRoutledge - Taylor & Francis Group
    Pages61-71
    ISBN (Electronic)978-1-315-40289-5
    ISBN (Print)978-1-138-22427-8
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Keywords

    • Architecture
    • Literature
    • literary methods
    • Poetic Writing
    • Atmosphere

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How Places Speak: A Plea for Poetic Receptivity in Architectural Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this