Marchenko wavefield redatuming, imaging conditions, and the effect of model errors

Sjoerd de Ridder, Joost van der Neut, A Curtis, Kees Wapenaar

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeConference contributionScientificpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
38 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Recently, a novel method to redatum the wavefield in the sub-surface from a reflection response measured at the surface has gained interest for imaging primaries in the presence of strong internal multiples. A prerequisite for the algorithm is an accurate and correct estimate of the direct-wave Green's function. However, usually we use an estimate for the direct-wave Green's function computed in a background velocity medium. Here, we investigate the effect of amplitude and phase errors in that estimate. We formulate two novel imaging conditions based on double-focusing the measured reflection response inside the subsurface. These yield information on the amplitude error in the estimate for the direct-wave Green's function which we can then correct, but the phase error remains elusive.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2016
EditorsCharles Sicking, John Ferguson
PublisherSEG
Pages5155-5159
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
EventSEG International Exposition and 86th Annual Meeting - Dallas & Kay Bailey Hutchison Convention Center, Dallas, United States
Duration: 16 Oct 201621 Oct 2016
Conference number: 86
http://seg.org/Events/Annual-Meeting

Publication series

NameSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts
PublisherSEG
Volume2016
ISSN (Electronic)1949-4645

Conference

ConferenceSEG International Exposition and 86th Annual Meeting
Abbreviated titleSEG 2016
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityDallas
Period16/10/1621/10/16
Internet address

Keywords

  • inversion
  • autofocusing
  • imaging
  • internal multiples
  • velocity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Marchenko wavefield redatuming, imaging conditions, and the effect of model errors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this