Planners’ role in accommodating citizen disagreement: The case of Dutch urban planning

Esin Özdemir, Tuna Tasan-Kok

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    12 Citations (Scopus)
    40 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Citizen disagreement on urban policies and planning decisions is both ubiquitous and fundamental to democracy. Post-political debates debunk the ‘consensus approach’, which is grounded in Habermasian communication theory, for circumventing disagreement. This article presents a counter argument. Our analysis of the highly institutionalised and consensus-oriented Dutch planning framework shows that this system does not necessarily prevent effective voicing of disagreement. The empirical material demonstrates that consensus is not a pre-defined and static outcome but a dynamic and sensitive process in which urban planning is an instrument. We conclude that planners could facilitate consensus through accommodative roles that address disagreement by taking an adaptive, proactive and more human stance.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalUrban Studies: an international journal for research in urban studies
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 25 Oct 2017

    Keywords

    • citizen disagreement
    • consensus
    • Dutch urban planning
    • post-politics
    • urban planners

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Planners’ role in accommodating citizen disagreement: The case of Dutch urban planning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this