TY - JOUR
T1 - Reservoir lithology classification based on seismic inversion results by Hidden Markov Models
T2 - Applying prior geological information
AU - Feng, Runhai
AU - Luthi, Stefan M.
AU - Gisolf, Dries
AU - Angerer, Erika
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) have been applied to predict reservoir lithologies using seismic inversion results as inputs. This approach takes into account the conditional probabilities between different lithologies, i.e. the vertical transitions in sedimentary sequences. These properties are used as prior geological information. In order to relate the seismic inversion results to the true well-log data, HMMs need to be trained based on the Expectation-Maximization theory. Application of the resulting model on a synthetic example from the Book Cliffs (Utah, USA) showed that most lithologies are classified correctly, even for some thin layers. A comparison with point-wise methods in which data samples are treated independently from each other, such as k-means and fuzzy logic classifiers, leads to the conclusion that the spatial correlation in HMMs allows better lithological predictions because the prior information accounts for the geological depositional processes. A real case study with data from the Vienna Basin (Austria) is performed, in which lithologies in a 3D cube are obtained based on properties from seismic inversions, via trained HMMs. While the vertical sequences are shown to be reasonably well predicted, the horizontal continuities are not. This indicates that the future research should focus on the lateral geological relationships.
AB - Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) have been applied to predict reservoir lithologies using seismic inversion results as inputs. This approach takes into account the conditional probabilities between different lithologies, i.e. the vertical transitions in sedimentary sequences. These properties are used as prior geological information. In order to relate the seismic inversion results to the true well-log data, HMMs need to be trained based on the Expectation-Maximization theory. Application of the resulting model on a synthetic example from the Book Cliffs (Utah, USA) showed that most lithologies are classified correctly, even for some thin layers. A comparison with point-wise methods in which data samples are treated independently from each other, such as k-means and fuzzy logic classifiers, leads to the conclusion that the spatial correlation in HMMs allows better lithological predictions because the prior information accounts for the geological depositional processes. A real case study with data from the Vienna Basin (Austria) is performed, in which lithologies in a 3D cube are obtained based on properties from seismic inversions, via trained HMMs. While the vertical sequences are shown to be reasonably well predicted, the horizontal continuities are not. This indicates that the future research should focus on the lateral geological relationships.
KW - Hidden Markov Models (HMMs)
KW - Lateral geological information
KW - Lithology classification
KW - Seismic inversion
KW - Vertical transitions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043523321&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.03.004
DO - 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.03.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85043523321
SN - 0264-8172
VL - 93
SP - 218
EP - 229
JO - Marine and Petroleum Geology
JF - Marine and Petroleum Geology
ER -