Revisiting public debate on Genetic Modification and Genetically Modified Organisms. Explanations for contemporary Dutch public attitudes

Lucien Hanssen, Anne M. Dijkstra, Susanne Sleenhoff, Lynn J. Frewer, Jan M. Gutteling

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)
    24 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Genetic Modification (GM) has been a topic of public debates during the 1990s and 2000s. In this paper we explore the relative importance of two hypothesized explanations for these controversies: (i) people's general attitude toward science and technology and (ii) their trust in governance, in GM actors, and in GM regulations, in explaining the Dutch public's Attitude toward GM applications, and in addition to that, the public's GM Information seeking behaviour. This will be conducted through the application of representative survey methodology. The results indicate that Attitudes toward GM applications are best predicted by both the attitude toward science and technology and three trust measures. GM information seeking is predicted by gender and educational level, as well as attitude toward science and technology, trust in organisations and trust in regulations (negative). Overall, psychological variables seem better predictors than demographics. Implications for future research on information seeking behaviour are discussed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages20
    JournalJournal of Science Communication
    Volume17
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018

    Keywords

    • Public perception of science and technology
    • Risk communication
    • science communication
    • theory and models

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting public debate on Genetic Modification and Genetically Modified Organisms. Explanations for contemporary Dutch public attitudes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this