Source backtracking for dust storm emission inversion using an adjoint method: Case study of Northeast China

Jianbing Jin, Arjo Segers, Hong Liao, Arnold Heemink, Richard Kranenburg, Hai Xiang Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)


Emission inversion using data assimilation fundamentally relies on having the correct assumptions about the emission background error covariance. A perfect covariance accounts for the uncertainty based on prior knowledge and is able to explain differences between model simulations and observations. In practice, emission uncertainties are constructed empirically; hence, a partially unrepresentative covariance is unavoidable. Concerning its complex parameterization, dust emissions are a typical example where the uncertainty could be induced from many underlying inputs, e.g., information on soil composition and moisture, land cover and erosive wind velocity, and these can hardly be taken into account together. This paper describes how an adjoint model can be used to detect errors in the emission uncertainty assumptions. This adjoint-based sensitivity method could serve as a supplement of a data assimilation inverse modeling system to trace back the error sources in case large observation-minus-simulation residues remain after assimilation based on empirical background covariance.

The method follows an application of a data assimilation emission inversion for an extreme severe dust storm over East Asia <span classCombining double low line"cit"idCombining double low line"xref_paren.1">(<a hrefCombining double low line"#bib1.bibx31">Jin et al.</a>, <a hrefCombining double low line"#bib1.bibx31">2019</a><a hrefCombining double low line"#bib1.bibx31">b</a>)</span>. The assimilation system successfully resolved observation-minus-simulation errors using satellite AOD observations in most of the dust-affected regions. However, a large underestimation of dust in Northeast China remained despite the fact that the assimilated measurements indicated severe dust plumes there. An adjoint implementation of our dust simulation model is then used to detect the most likely source region for these unresolved dust loads. The backward modeling points to the Horqin desert as the source region, which was indicated as a non-source region by the existing emission scheme. The reference emission and uncertainty are then reconstructed over the Horqin desert by assuming higher surface erodibility. After the emission reconstruction, the emission inversion is performed again, and the posterior dust simulations and reality are now in much closer harmony. Based on our results, it is advised that emission sources in dust transport models include the Horqin desert as a more active source region.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15207-15225
Number of pages19
JournalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Issue number23
Publication statusPublished - 2020


Dive into the research topics of 'Source backtracking for dust storm emission inversion using an adjoint method: Case study of Northeast China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this