TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of tissue biomechanics in the implantation and performance of inflatable penile prostheses
T2 - current state of the art and future perspective
AU - Bose, Shirsha
AU - Fereidoonnezhad, Behrooz
AU - Akbarzadeh Khorshidi, Majid
AU - Watschke, Brian
AU - Mareena, Evania
AU - Nolan, Daragh
AU - Cooney, Sean
AU - Cullen, Ivor M.
AU - Lally, Caitríona
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects to some degree approximately 52% of the male population aged 40-70 years. Many men do not respond to, or are precluded from using, pharmaceutical treatments for ED and are therefore advised to consider penile prostheses. Different types of penile prosthesis are available, such as inflatable penile prostheses (IPPs). IPPs consist of a pair of inflatable cylinders inserted into the corpora cavernosa (CC). During inflation/deflation of these cylinders, the CC and other surrounding tissues such as the tunica albuginea (TA) are highly impacted. Therefore, it is critical to understand the mechanics of penile tissues for successful implantation of IPPs and to reduce tissue damage induced by IPPs. OBJECTIVES: We explored the importance of the biomechanics of penile tissues for successful IPP function and reviewed and summarized the most significant studies on penile biomechanics that have been reported to date. METHODS: We performed an extensive literature review of publications on penile biomechanics and IPP implantation. RESULTS: Indenters have been used to characterize the mechanical behavior of whole penile tissue; however, this technique applied only local deformation, which limited insights into individual tissue components. Although one reported study addressed the mechanical behavior of TA, this investigation did not consider anisotropy, and there is a notable absence of biomechanical studies on CC and CS. This lack of understanding of penile tissue biomechanics has resulted in computational models that use linear-elastic materials, despite soft tissues generally exhibiting hyperelastic behavior. Furthermore, available benchtop/synthetic models do not have tissue properties matched to those of the human penis, limiting the scope of these models for use as preclinical testbeds for IPP testing. CONCLUSION: Improved understanding of penile tissue biomechanics would assist the development of realistic benchtop/synthetic and computational models enabling the long-term performance of IPPs to be better assessed.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects to some degree approximately 52% of the male population aged 40-70 years. Many men do not respond to, or are precluded from using, pharmaceutical treatments for ED and are therefore advised to consider penile prostheses. Different types of penile prosthesis are available, such as inflatable penile prostheses (IPPs). IPPs consist of a pair of inflatable cylinders inserted into the corpora cavernosa (CC). During inflation/deflation of these cylinders, the CC and other surrounding tissues such as the tunica albuginea (TA) are highly impacted. Therefore, it is critical to understand the mechanics of penile tissues for successful implantation of IPPs and to reduce tissue damage induced by IPPs. OBJECTIVES: We explored the importance of the biomechanics of penile tissues for successful IPP function and reviewed and summarized the most significant studies on penile biomechanics that have been reported to date. METHODS: We performed an extensive literature review of publications on penile biomechanics and IPP implantation. RESULTS: Indenters have been used to characterize the mechanical behavior of whole penile tissue; however, this technique applied only local deformation, which limited insights into individual tissue components. Although one reported study addressed the mechanical behavior of TA, this investigation did not consider anisotropy, and there is a notable absence of biomechanical studies on CC and CS. This lack of understanding of penile tissue biomechanics has resulted in computational models that use linear-elastic materials, despite soft tissues generally exhibiting hyperelastic behavior. Furthermore, available benchtop/synthetic models do not have tissue properties matched to those of the human penis, limiting the scope of these models for use as preclinical testbeds for IPP testing. CONCLUSION: Improved understanding of penile tissue biomechanics would assist the development of realistic benchtop/synthetic and computational models enabling the long-term performance of IPPs to be better assessed.
KW - animal models
KW - benchtop/synthetic models
KW - computational model
KW - erectile dysfunction
KW - inflatable penile prostheses
KW - IPP complications
KW - penile biomechanics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164211230&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/sxmrev/qead013
DO - 10.1093/sxmrev/qead013
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37164910
AN - SCOPUS:85164211230
SN - 2050-0521
VL - 11
SP - 268
EP - 277
JO - Sexual medicine reviews
JF - Sexual medicine reviews
IS - 3
ER -