Two-fluid simulations of an aerated lab-scale bioreactor

Roya Jamshidian, James Scully, Harry E.A. Van den Akker*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We report the findings of a detailed assessment of various options for computational two-fluid RANS simulations of an aerated agitated 2-L bioreactor equipped with a single baffle and several dip tubes. The simulations were carried out by using the commercial flow solver ANSYS/Fluent. Our focus was on (1) the outlet condition at the liquid's surface (i.e., including an air head space in the simulation yes or no); (2) the choice between the steady-state Multiple Reference Frames (MRF) approach for modelling the impeller rotation and the dynamic Sliding Mesh (SM) option; (3) the choice between two computational meshes (mosaic or polyhedral); and (4) the effect of using either the realizable k-ε model or the SST k-ω model for dealing with the turbulence in combination with different values for the fixed bubble size (either 1.8 or 2.8 mm). The final conclusion is that the SM impeller model in combination with a polyhedral computational mesh and the SST k-ω turbulence model is to be preferred. All simulations suffer from the occurrence of spurious velocities larger than the impeller tip velocity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)254-275
Number of pages22
JournalChemical Engineering Research and Design
Volume196
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Air headspace
  • Computational mesh
  • Impeller
  • Multiple reference frame
  • Sliding mesh
  • Spurious vectors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Two-fluid simulations of an aerated lab-scale bioreactor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this