Why and how we should mainstream social justice in the car-restrictive policy agenda

Nicola da Schio*, Eva Van Eenoo, Freke Caset, Line Vanparys, Françoise Bartiaux, Edoardo Luppari, Thomas Ermans, T. Verbeek, Kobe Boussauw, Monika Maciejewska, Simon Bothof, Geert te Boveldt, Benjamin Wayens, Tim Cassiers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Non-textual formWeb publication/siteScientific

40 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The authors of this BSI Position Paper argue that social justice should be an integral part of the car-restrictive policy agenda through specific and explicit claims. In this context, they propose that the distribution of the benefits and burdens related to car-restrictive policies should not reproduce – let alone exacerbate – socio-economic inequalities. First, these policies should not simply make driving or parking a car more expensive without being adapted to the financial capacities of those who pay. Second, there should be measures to ensure a fairer distribution of the spatial benefits of car-restrictive policies. Third, the capacity to shape the car-restrictive agenda should not be dependent on socio-economic status. And finally, an efficient public transport network that is accessible and affordable should be the centrepiece to provide mobility for all.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherInstitut de Recherches Interdisciplinaires sur Bruxelles
EditionBSI Position Papers #6
Media of outputOnline
Publication statusPublished - 13 Nov 2023

Keywords

  • car-restrictive policy
  • environmental justice
  • social justice
  • urban mobility

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why and how we should mainstream social justice in the car-restrictive policy agenda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this