Correction to: Are green buildings more liveable than conventional buildings? An examination from the perspective of occupants (Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, (2022), 10.1007/s10901-022-09983-9)

Ying Xu; Dan Luo; Queena K. Qian; Edwin H.W. Chan

doi:10.1007/s10901-023-10010-8

Correction to: Are green buildings more liveable than conventional buildings? An examination from the perspective of occupants (Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, (2022), 10.1007/s10901-022-09983-9)

Ying Xu, Dan Luo^*, Queena K. Qian, Edwin H.W. Chan

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Scientific › peer-review

19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the original publication of the article, the first affiliation “School of Public Administration, Hunan University, Changsha, China” was incorrectly repeated as fourth affiliation. The fourth affiliation should be “Building and Real Estate Dept. Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR”. The original article has been corrected.

Original language	English
Number of pages	1
Journal	Journal of Housing and the Built Environment
Volume	38
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-023-10010-8
Publication status	Published - 2023

Bibliographical note

Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care
Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.

Access to Document

10.1007/s10901-023-10010-8

s10901-023-10010-8Final published version, 314 KB

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Are green buildings more liveable than conventional buildings? An examination from the perspective of occupants (Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, (2022), 10.1007/s10901-022-09983-9)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

1 Article

Are green buildings more liveable than conventional buildings? An examination from the perspective of occupants
Xu, Y., Luo, D., Qian, Q. K. & Chan, E. H. W., 2022, In: Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 38 (2023), 2, p. 1047-1066 20 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

Open Access
File
2 Citations (Scopus)

39 Downloads (Pure)

Cite this

@article{a68507af4881452985b492e3760cb087,

title = "Correction to: Are green buildings more liveable than conventional buildings? An examination from the perspective of occupants (Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, (2022), 10.1007/s10901-022-09983-9)",

abstract = "In the original publication of the article, the first affiliation “School of Public Administration, Hunan University, Changsha, China” was incorrectly repeated as fourth affiliation. The fourth affiliation should be “Building and Real Estate Dept. Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR”. The original article has been corrected.",

author = "Ying Xu and Dan Luo and Qian, {Queena K.} and Chan, {Edwin H.W.}",

note = "Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.",

year = "2023",

doi = "10.1007/s10901-023-10010-8",

language = "English",

volume = "38",

journal = "Journal of Housing and the Built Environment",

issn = "1566-4910",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "2",

}

Correction to: Are green buildings more liveable than conventional buildings? An examination from the perspective of occupants (Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, (2022), 10.1007/s10901-022-09983-9). / Xu, Ying; Luo, Dan; Qian, Queena K. et al.
In: Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Scientific › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction to

T2 - Are green buildings more liveable than conventional buildings? An examination from the perspective of occupants (Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, (2022), 10.1007/s10901-022-09983-9)

AU - Xu, Ying

AU - Luo, Dan

AU - Qian, Queena K.

AU - Chan, Edwin H.W.

N1 - Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - In the original publication of the article, the first affiliation “School of Public Administration, Hunan University, Changsha, China” was incorrectly repeated as fourth affiliation. The fourth affiliation should be “Building and Real Estate Dept. Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR”. The original article has been corrected.

AB - In the original publication of the article, the first affiliation “School of Public Administration, Hunan University, Changsha, China” was incorrectly repeated as fourth affiliation. The fourth affiliation should be “Building and Real Estate Dept. Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR”. The original article has been corrected.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147098634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10901-023-10010-8

DO - 10.1007/s10901-023-10010-8

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

AN - SCOPUS:85147098634

SN - 1566-4910

VL - 38

JO - Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

JF - Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

IS - 2

ER -

Correction to: Are green buildings more liveable than conventional buildings? An examination from the perspective of occupants (Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, (2022), 10.1007/s10901-022-09983-9)

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Research output

Are green buildings more liveable than conventional buildings? An examination from the perspective of occupants

Cite this